Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn, Threads, & Mastodon at the same time, in one click.
Make it punchier 👊
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion 🙏
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators love Typefully
170,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Köhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
🙈 Distraction-free
✍️ Write-only Twitter
🧵 Effortless threads
📈 Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
We’ve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If you’re still tweeting from Twitter you’re wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully 😍
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Writing prompts & personalized post ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
90% of YouTube analytics (especially CTR & AVD) are poison to understanding virality.
Most YT gurus love these metrics since you can always tell a coherent story without contradiction.
A book written in 2001 (4 years before YT's birth) provides a clear explanation of why.
👇
Fooled by Randomness, a book by Nassim Taleb is by far the greatest book ever written to help you differentiate information & noise.
Taleb explains how we create reasons and patterns for wild success even though it is essentially random.
Mild success can be explained by skills and hard work, but wild success is usually attributable to variance and luck.
Let's take CTR, for instance.
What you will usually hear is you need to increase your CTR to increase your views, If the CTR is low, change the thumbnail & title.
While this seems perfectly logical, it's absolutely wrong.
Here is an example with two videos of mine.
If I hid the views, most YouTube gurus would argue that the thumbnail of the second is better. And it would've been perfectly logical.
The problem is that reality is far more complex to fathom.
If I didn't reach 1M+ viral videos and reverse-engineer them, I wouldn't have the data to comprehend this phenomenon.
What I observed is quite the opposite, the more viral the video, the lower the CTR.
When the algorithm finds a "viral-worthy" video, it will try to push it to new audiences outside your initial circle.
Throughout this test process, the click-through rate will be significantly lower as people are less likely to click (and vice-versa).
Keep in mind there are many more pieces to the puzzle, I can't go into too much detail here, this is just a simplification.
Numerous other elements come into play that make metrics alone insufficient to fully understand the outcome.
Taleb calls it the "Hindsight Bias."
When we look back at past events, we see them as less random than they actually were.
The problem with YouTube gurus is that the majority of people are unable to present the contradiction since it requires 2 things:
• A long experience with several viral videos
• Study them without being fooled by randomness
This leaves very few people on the table.
Here is another example (I could go like this all day long).
These two videos are about the same duration.
• Video A has 44% retention in the first 30 seconds
• Video B, 63%.
Result: Video A outperforms B by 246k views.
In that case, video A started right away with a sponsored ad, which is why the starting retention was lower.
The algorithm is really good at tracking if people loved a video or not through hundreds of different factors.
This leads us to another takeaway from the book:
• Silent evidence prevents us from having an accurate understanding of past events.
As the creator of these videos, I knew the first video would perform better because I know my audience very well through non-analytics analysis.
If I was obsessed with analytics, trust me, I would've turned insane by now.
After 12 years, I've seen everything and its opposite.
As a creator, you want to improve these:
• Human behavior understanding
• Content crafting (storytelling, good editing...)
• Conveying emotions
• Providing unique value
Not these:
• CTR
• AVD
• Retention
• etc
As they are mostly noise, not signal.
The more data, the more noise.
Hold on tight to the fundamentals.