Typefully

Why do we say that methods matter in Bioinformatics? An immunotherapy example

Avatar

Share

 • 

3 years ago

 • 

View on X

‼️Why do we say that #methodsmatter? Here’s a telling example. Two very recent studies asked the exact same cancer #immunotherapy prediction question, on the exact same dataset. They reached contradictory conclusions. Why? Slight changes in the #Bioinformatics methods used👇 twitter.com/NCIEytanRuppin/status/1610202233521438721
The changes are: 1.analyze data per cancer type vs. pan-cancer 2.use cutoff of 0.2 vs. 0.1 for calling a copy number alteration The contradictory conclusions are: 1.aneuploidy score (AS) is not predictive of immunotherapy response 2.a new metric is predictive & outperforms AS
Here’s links to the two studies, Spurr et al was published in November 2022 & Cheng et al was posted on biorxiv in December 2022 nature.com/articles/s41588-022-01235-4 biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.28.522101v1
This example is conceptually representative for some of the core principles that define #Bioinformatics #DataScience. Minor changes in methods or statistical frameworks used can qualitatively change entire narratives. Choice of thresholds is important Reproducibility matters‼️
Avatar

Simona Cristea

@simocristea

Cancer Data Scientist @Harvard & @DanaFarber | Prev @eth | 🇷🇴🇸🇪🇨🇭🇺🇸 I explain complex genomics concepts in-depth & share recent research ♥️🇨🇭🍫