Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn & Mastodon too. More platforms coming soon.
Make it punchier 👊
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion 🙏
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators love Typefully
150,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Köhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
🙈 Distraction-free
✍️ Write-only Twitter
🧵 Effortless threads
📈 Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
We’ve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If you’re still tweeting from Twitter you’re wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully 😍
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Writing prompts & personalized post ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
2/Eye-opening interview: oil sands producers only want to reduce emissions when it's profitable for them to do so.
Dan Wicklum was COSIA CEO for 7.5 years.
He worked closely with sr. oil sands execs on issues like GHGs.
#OOTT#ABleg#ABpoliyoutu.be/7DBSScmLWu0
3/There are many examples to back up Wicklum's argument.
@kevinbirn of @SPGlobal explains how phasing out Suncor's Base Mine coke boiler both lowers emissions AND costs by using energy to create steam more efficiently.
youtu.be/Mp-bSV0ntB4
4/Wicklum references a CNRL exec who says that if emissions reduction is a net cost to the company, it won't invest capital to do so.
Should this be acceptable to policymakers?
Should producers get a pass on climate targets if meeting them costs money?
5/Birn explains S&P forecast for 500,000 b/d oil sands production increase by 2030.
Should producers get to grow emissions because they want to grow supply?
youtu.be/HAcVWaeqq6M
6/ G&M says oil sands GHG reductions will only be 15 Mt/yr by 2030?
Not that long ago, the Pathways Alliance estimated it could reduce emissions 22 Mt/yr by 2030.
What happened?
Pathways Alliance strategy from @CanadianNatural's latest investor presentation.
7/Suncor is reducing 2030 emissions by 10 Mt/yr (from 29 Mt/yr to 19 Mt/yr).
Suncor's latest climate report says that 14 Mt/yr by 2030 may be possible.
No other oil sands company has plans to lower emissions.
Why is that?
If one producer can do it, why not all of them?
8/@Pembina's chart suggests that the other producers aren't trying all that hard, which supports Wicklum's argument.
10/Here's CNRL in 2023 claiming that IPEP can reduce emissions by 40%.
Oh, and the IPEP "pilot" was a success.
Then why not roll it out quicker?
And why not share it with other oil sands mining producers, as CNRL's Romero told me the company would do through @COSIA_ca?
11/More context: not all oil sands projects are created equal.
Mined SCO (synthetic crude oil), CSS (combined cyclic steam) dilbit emit far more than SAGD dilbit, mined PFT dilbit.
Shouldn't govts expect producers to clean up their dirtiest operations?
Source: S&P Global
12/Really important context: some of the dirtiest oil sands projects are also the most profitable.
Before Husky Energy was merged with Cenovus, it criticized carbon pricing that penalized its CCS production, arguing that CSS was a big contributor to ABGov royalty revenues.
13/Pembina report: “Decarbonizing Canada’s oil and gas supply: Cutting the sector’s emissions by 2030 is key to reaching net-zero by 2050.”
Sets out a pathway to hit 2030 targets.
Interview with @jangorsk, director of the oil and gas program.
youtu.be/t1_ujmIeMvk
14/Pembina's plan seems commonsensical to me.
Go hard on the easy stuff (why stop at 75% fugitive methane emission reductions by 2030?) while building the more complex stuff (like CCUS, which requires a carbon pipeline, underground storage).
15/Here's why the Graney's story is crap.
S&P's email to @EnergiMedia:
"The report cited by the Globe and Mail provides an independent analysis of potential abatement scenarios on the CDN oil sands over time. It measures possible impacts under different conditions."
16/Where is the discussion of the different abatement scenarios?
What about possible impacts? What is the lower range of those impacts?
What are the different conditions?
If G&M has the numbers, it has that information.
Why not include that in the story?
17/Context changes everything, as I've shown above, and there's plenty more where that came from.
How about some of that context instead of just reaction comments from the usual suspects?
G&M is Canada's newspaper of record. It should do better. Much better.