Get fresh prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
The best writing experience, with powerful scheduling
Create your content without distractions - where it's easier to write and organize threads.
Cross-post to LinkedIn
NEW
Automatically add LinkedIn versions to your posts.
+14
Followers
Discover what works with powerful analytics
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
@frankdilo
Feedback?
@albigiu
Love it 🔥
Collaborate on drafts and leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
🧵
Rewrite as thread start
🔥
Make it Punchier
✅
Fix Grammar
Improve your content with AI suggestions and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Tweets
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Top tweeters love Typefully
100,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence. Join them.
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
I forgot about Twitter for 10 years. Now I'm remembering why I liked it in the first place.
Huge part of my new love for it: @typefully. It makes writing threads easy and oddly fun.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully.
ian hollander@ianhollander
Such a huge fan of what @typefully has brought to the writing + publishing experience for Twitter.
Easy, elegant and almost effortless threads - and a beautiful UX that feels intuitive for the task - and inviting to use.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Kudos to @frankdilo and @linuz90 for building such a delightful experience.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your tweet with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each tweet to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your tweets for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Tweet with daily inspiration
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Start with a fresh idea
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Check examples out
Get inspiration from tweets that used these prompts and ideas.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
@frankdilo
Feedback?
@albigiu
Love it 🔥
Add comments
NEW
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
Let's see how Amazon CodeWhisperer and GitHub Copilot compare!
CodeWhisperer: in preview, just announced. Python, Java, JS
Copilot: generally available, just graduated from preview. Dozens of languages(?)
I'll compare a couple scenarios, but let me know if you have test ideas👇
I'll use Python cause it's supported by both (Java's too long and I have a complicated relationship with Javascript).
CodeWhisperer and Copilot both give multiple suggestions, I'll chose the "best" one, as determined by my dum-dum brain. Suggestions will differ as they evolve!
Scenario 1: prime number generation!
Both CodeWhisperer and Copilot suggest the same code: the colorful code is what each tool suggests 😆
Scenario 2: dum-dum interview questions that should have no place in the interview process!
For "Longest Substring Without Repeating Characters"... it seems that CodeWhisperer prefered code with more comments? I don't wanna look at the code cause I hate LeetCode with a passion.
Scenario 3: uploading a file to S3!
CodeWhisperer does not initialize the s3 boto client (so trained on a bunch of Lambda code?) while Copilot wants to make the file public (so trained on tutorial code?)
Scenario 3 extra: uploading a file to S3, but with code reference!
CodeWhisperer has the awesome feature of "Reference tracker": it tells you where it got the code from!
We know that part of the S3 upload code was taken from dfile-rust! THIS is an awesome feature and I love it!
Scenario 4: EKS cluster creation!
Neither are great, but Copilot fails terribly by trying to create an EKS 1.14 cluster (current supported versions are 1.19 to 1.22).
Recency bias and manual training are where I've seen all the PoCs for Copilot stumble.
Scenario 5: send a message to SQS!
CodeWhisperer has better practices, but Copilot's example is so muuuuch more helpful for me as a developer (not the best use of attributes, but still).