Built for š, LinkedIn, and Threads, powered by AI
Write & schedule, effortlessly
Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn, Threads, & Mastodon at the same time, in one click.
Make it punchier š
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it š„
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion š
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators loveĀ Typefully
170,000+ creators andĀ teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Kƶhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
š Distraction-free
āļø Write-only Twitter
š§µ Effortless threads
š Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
Weāve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If youāre still tweeting from Twitter youāre wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully š
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor ā unique and super useful š
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content inĀ seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - withĀ noĀ need forĀ extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics thatĀ matter
Build your audience with insights that makeĀ sense.
Writing prompts & personalized postĀ ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweetsĀ together
Write and publish with your teammates andĀ friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it š„
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
How about fixing legal loopholes through incentivized testing?
Watertight laws without loopholes matter and the concept of automated testing from software engineering could revolutionize how we draft them.
Read on for my thoughts...š§µ
#LawReformtwitter.com/hiddentao/status/1776167743236034609
The issue with the drafting of laws is that donors often sway elected officials, impacting their integrity.
This is due to the fact that the people drafting laws are also the ones trusted to ensure they're strong and watertight. This setup is ripe for a conflict of interests.
In software, we have testing as a part of the production process. Ensure code correctness and that it matches the spec prior to production deployment.
And as much as possible, automate the tests so that they're easier to run, more efficient, and thus more likely to be run.
The ideal QA / testing testing setup is one where the test writers and executors are different people to the coders.
Coders want to ship on timeĀ and tend to be lazy about testing.
Testers aren't emotionally invested in the code and can be more rigorous with their tests.
Applying this to laws, we would have a separating "tester house" for testing bills prior to them being passed as laws.
Lawmakers would stake money into a vault and submit their bill for testing. Testers would receive rewards from this pot for every loophole found.
Once enough time had elapsed, testing would be complete and the bill would be sent back for revisions.
The process would then repeat until some criteria is met whereby the bill would is then deemed ready to be a law.
Example criteria could be:
* At least 5 rounds of testing have been completed.
* No loopholes found in the last round of testing.
* etc.
When submitting a bill for testing, lawmakers would specify the amount of money staked (and thus available as a payout) as well as the duration of time available for testing.
Testers would pick and choose the laws they wish to test according to what suits them best.
This creates a law-testing "market" of sorts whereby lawmakers need to offer enough and enough testing time to make it worth a tester's while to test their bill. The sooner they wish to get their bill passed, the better an offer they have to make to testers.
Any money remaining in the staking vault at the end of testing iterations would be returned to lawmakers as bonus income on top of their base salary. Note that testers would also be paid a base salary, and so any payout received by them would be bonus income.
These financial incentives result in two things:
* Lawmakers are incentivized to minimize the no. of loopholes in their laws.
* Testers are incentivized to find as many loopholes as possible
Testers can also be influenced and bribed. To try to mitigate this somewhat, the "tester house" membership would be open to anyone and everyone who wishes to be a tester, as long as they meet certain regulatory criteria. Testers would then compete against each other for jobs.
Automated testing is desirable. But it's not easy to express all laws as code. This is where I think LLMs and AI in general can play a role - in making it easier to come up with test cases and thus find loopholes in a given bill.