Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn & Mastodon too. More platforms coming soon.
Make it punchier 👊
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion 🙏
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators love Typefully
150,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Köhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
🙈 Distraction-free
✍️ Write-only Twitter
🧵 Effortless threads
📈 Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
We’ve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If you’re still tweeting from Twitter you’re wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully 😍
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Writing prompts & personalized post ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
Yesterday, the CFTC (the commodities equivalent of the SEC) issued fines to 3 different DeFi companies for failing to comply with various registration requirements, failing to comply with KYC requirements, and offering leveraged and margined retail transactions.
Many of you have read some of my posts taking Gary Gensler and the SEC to task for their "regulation by enforcement" agenda, failing to issue rules requested by the crypto industry, and gross overreach and attempts to expand their jurisdiction.
Let me be clear: The SEC has done all of those things and more and is a government regulator that is out of control. So too is the CFTC. As CFTC Commissioner Mersinger wrote in her dissent:
"I am concerned that the Commission in these cases is taking another step down the path of bringing enforcement actions when we should be engaging with the public. It is important to emphasize that “Enforcement First” has not always been the CFTC’s default position."
She further writes: "[T]hese cases represent another example of the CFTC swinging its enforcement hammer when other, more precise tools would be a better fit for the job, I respectfully dissent."
And most troubling, and correctly, points out:
"The handling of these matters through enforcement obscures that one of the cases before us is not like the others. In that case, the Respondent’s technology enabled users to execute spot trades in thousands of different...
digital asset trading pairs; the CFTC does not have regulatory jurisdiction over such spot trading, which is lawful activity under the CEA. The Commission nonetheless holds this Respondent liable because its protocol also was used to trade some leveraged digital assets...
issued by unaffiliated third parties, which could be created by utilizing a set of smart contracts designed and deployed by third parties that automatically executes a series of actions on other third-party DeFi lending platforms and decentralized exchanges...
to generate leverage. This raises questions: If a DeFi protocol is developed for lawful purposes but is used for purposes that violate the CEA, should the developer be held liable?"
Ultimately, the CFTC is engaging in the exact same tactics as the SEC - regulation by enforcement, refusal to engage with the crypto industry, pretending that all technologies are the same, and exceeding its statutorily conferred authority.
In these cases, the Ds have accepted their fines. But, there will be future cases that are litigated, & the CFTC will lose, especially on the point that creation of legal software, that is later used for illegal purposes by third parties, confers liability on its programers.
That is like saying that Microsoft is liable when a crazy person sends a threatening email to the President because Microsoft created Outlook and Exchange. The software itself can be used for legal and illegal purposes; it is the user who is liable, not the programer.
But the point of this thread is not to point out the SEC's and CFTC's failings. Instead, the point is to point out that overzealous regulators will continue to harass the crypto industry until they are replaced. Yes, we will win in court, but that is slow and expensive.
We need to focus on winning in the legislative process and in the agencies themselves and there is only one way to do that: win at the ballot box.
There have been calls for Biden to fire Gary Gensler. But what do you think will happen when/if he does? Do you think he'll replace him with someone who has completely different policy goals? No. He will replace him with someone who pushes the exact same policies.
Do you think agencies will reverse their positions just because they lose in court? No, absolutely not. They will try to distinguish and differentiate the facts of the court cases to the facts before them to implement their policy goals.
The actions of the SEC, CFTC, and various other governmental agencies are intentional and are designed to implement specific policy goals. In this case, that policy goal is to regulate crypto out of existence, or at least into the shadows.
Why? There are lots of potential reasons. Some "valid" and some not. Some people honestly believe that crypto is used solely for criminal activity and by terrorists and they have a valid interest in limiting those uses cases.
Other people, however, simply want to make sure their donors continue to get their fees (bank and transaction fees would reduce precipitously if intermediaries weren't necessary - as DeFi allows).
The reason for the policy goals don't actually matter. What matters is that at this point there are lots of people who believe the correct policy is to kill crypto, they hold elected office, and you're never going to change their minds.
As I said above, our only option is to win in the legislative process and at the agencies themselves, and the only way to do that is to win elections. Primary season is incoming, so you have a very real & tangible way to help: donate to primary candidates who are pro crypto.
When those candidates win their primaries, donate to them in the general election and, of course, VOTE FOR THEM!
So yes, we will win in Court, but things will be a lot better for us if we avoid Court and just win at the ballot box.