Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn & Mastodon too. More platforms coming soon.
Make it punchier π
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it π₯
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion π
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators loveΒ Typefully
150,000+ creators andΒ teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc KΓΆhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
π Distraction-free
βοΈ Write-only Twitter
𧡠Effortless threads
π Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
Weβve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If youβre still tweeting from Twitter youβre wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully π
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor β unique and super useful π
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content inΒ seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - withΒ noΒ need forΒ extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics thatΒ matter
Build your audience with insights that makeΒ sense.
Writing prompts & personalized postΒ ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweetsΒ together
Write and publish with your teammates andΒ friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it π₯
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
I've been doing some research on $wBTC for the past 24 hours. I'd recommend steering clear of any wrapped assets for the time being.
Highlighting some of my concerns to eyes on this and hopefully clear up some of the concerns around wrapped asset custody + liquidity.
𧡠β
I'm not an expert on $wBTC or wrapped assets so take this with a grain of salt. I'd appreciate misconceptions being corrected, I'm simply sharing my findings lately...
My rsearch started after seeing unusual activity on the wBTC / BTC pair which fell 2% from 1:1 liquid peg.
Normally this is a free arb for big players so why is this happening now?
Checking the wBTC website and their proof of assets shows more than full backing so where is the issue? Taking a deeper look at asset custody was the next step.
wbtc.network/dashboard/audit
When looking at $wBTC there are two roles...
1. Custodian - Holds the BTC backing for wBTC + keys to mint tokens
2. Merchants - Key parties which send/receive the BTC in order to mint/burn wBTC.
In this case, @BitGo is the custodian and the merchant is one of 60+ partners.
The concern for me is if @BitGo were to be insolvent, I'd assume that wBTC holders would not be considered BitGo creditors.
If they custody Billions of $'s in $BTC, what happens when either BitGo or their merchants file for bankruptcy? Crypto lawyers could use your help here..?
The 2nd part of wBTC, is the merchants responsible for burning/minting wBTC for customers.
There are more than 60+ partners who currently have the ability to mint/burn wBTC.
wbtc.network/dashboard/partners
Partners include 3AC, Nexo, Ren Protocol, Crypto .com, Coinlist, and plenty of other parties.
As you know, some of these have already filed for bankruptcy and some others have speculation surrounding them. Alameda was the only one removed from the list.
twitter.com/kingblockchain/status/1595333235348832257?s=20&t=DT4piDO9f7wNYSGrkLaiyg
Keep in mind these are only merchants for minting/burning and not $BTC custodians like @BitGo. This means they had access to burn/mint but likely held minimal amounts of the underlying BTC, if any.
The issue I see here would be on bankruptcy filings and possible asset clawbacks.
Multiple issuers have been struggling with burning/minting since the FTX fallout occurred.
In a healthy market, market makers are minting/burning quick enough to hold the 1:1 wbtc/btc peg. That currently isn't happening and users are stuck.
twitter.com/gregosuri/status/1595250748714938370?s=20&t=v-80149cDmrHdFLe_FR42g
Ideally, I'd like to be able to verify that all 235k $BTC in "Custody" are all held in wallets controlled by @BitGo. Proof of assets onchain helps, it's impossible to tell if these would be tied into legal proceedings.
Onchain analysts should further explore the custody wallets.
My thought would be if @AlamedaResearch issued these $wBTC and @BitGo held custody, wouldn't the $BTC end up with creditors of FTX US instead of backing $wBTC?
It could be that $wBTC holders end up responsible for the debt if the underlying BTC is rolled into Alameda bankruptcy.
Another bit player mentioned the $wBTC white paper, is @renprotocol. AKA Republic Protocol or more well known as $REN + $renBTC.
$REN is a native BTC bridge that has been through all the headlines recently, mainly for unfortunate reasons.
This puts a large number of assets on chain at risk if not burnt within the next 30 days. The goal would be to move towards Ren 2.0 and transition away from Alameda, but that's only if they are able to raise funds to continue operations.
The hacker still has over 8 figures worth of funds that they are trying to move across the bridge w/o liquidity for it.
If the hacker is an FTX insider, could they be forcing the liquidity crunch knowing that wrapped assets will suffer?
twitter.com/Dogetoshi/status/1594733859668729856?s=20&t=EBHheeHXCt7n3e2uHTZ47g
Bridge liquidity and the trapped FTX exploiter are the two main risk factors that I'm keeping an eye on from a $REN perspective.
I haven't used @renprotocol before researching the past few days, so maybe others more familiar can provide more color.
My belief is that it is better to natively hold your asset and we've repeatedly been shown to not trust 3rd parties, this is no different.
For the time being, I'd exit wrappers like $renBTC / $wBTC / $wETH and others until confirmed to be safe.
If you are stuck in wBTC, I'd recommend using @THORChain or @krakenfx to swap for native $BTC to be safe.
It's tricky because both CEXs and Oracles might get tested if $wBTC is having issues. Holding $wBTC when your customers own $BTC could turn into a pile of bad debt.
DeFi protocols with a ton of wrapped assets could run into a tough time if these assets heavily depeg from 1:1. Once again, I'd err on the side of caution in this market when it comes to taking on risk.
There is an immense amount of DeFi liquidity in wrapped tokens so stay safe.
It looks like @AaveAave for example has seen a large uptick in wBTC usage as of late. This could be due to the Avi / CRV anticks or possibly users shorting wBTC.
This feels largely like a market maker failure so far the market is pricing in wBTC risk by being 1%+ away from 1:1.
Personally feel that where there is smoke, there is fire. Especially when it comes to crypto. I do doubt that the large majority of wBTC / renBTC backing is in danger though.
Ideally, some chads with legal backgrounds can help clarify how this might play out.
Remember... "Not your keys, not your coins."
Stay safe and hopefully, this leads to some good discoveries and discussion. Demand transparency from third parties!