Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn & Mastodon too. More platforms coming soon.
Make it punchier 👊
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion 🙏
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators love Typefully
150,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Köhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
🙈 Distraction-free
✍️ Write-only Twitter
🧵 Effortless threads
📈 Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
We’ve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If you’re still tweeting from Twitter you’re wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully 😍
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Writing prompts & personalized post ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
The intentional manner in which they present themselves is designed to mislead and draw in people like me. Once upon a time, before I understood how my perception was being manipulated, I thought these medical professionals were credible. Gift link: wapo.st/3Ctxq2O
2/ They looked it, so perhaps the consensus wasn't so clear-cut? That impression I had was the point. The illusion of credible debate confuses the public and allows people to believe whatever they want.
3/ This method of casting doubt is used by various groups, often linked with extreme religious beliefs or profit-driven private industries, to question the established science that doesn't align with their feelings.
5/ Over time, I began to notice inconsistencies in their representation of data. For instance, they would often omit studies that contradicted their desired outcomes, focus on small sample sizes, and ignore robust research suggesting different conclusions.
7/ Unfortunately, this confusion was likely the effect they intended to provoke. In such a hostile environment, individuals raising concerns are often discredited and shunned, which further strengthens their deceptive strategy.
8/ One of their tactics is to deflect valid criticism by employing the 'No True Scotsman' fallacy. This is a logical error wherein an assertion is defended by manipulating the criteria to exclude contradicting evidence.
10/ This technique is commonly used to brush aside genuine concerns, especially those related to women's rights.
The group's falsehoods are manifold.
11/ They misrepresent healthcare access, outcomes, and even the reasons behind the declining average family size, asserting it has to do with abortion or hormonal contraceptives, despite the average number of children per woman falling below three in the early 1900s.
12/ Their manipulation of facts extends to redefining medical terminology; for example, before the late 1980s, the term 'abortion' did not differentiate between induced and spontaneous. But this changed as the culture shifted, creating a new, separate meaning for each term.
13/ A 1985 letter to The Lancet shows the recency of the shift.
"It is curious that, in a language as descriptively rich as English, no clear distinction is made between a spontaneous and an induced expulsion of the contents of the uterus in early pregnancy."
14/ "Doctors use the word ‘abortion’ regardless of whether it was a spontaneous or induced event… It seems likely that the words have been interchangeable for many centuries..."
15/ This strategic wordplay allows them to distinguish induced and spontaneous abortions as completely dissimilar events.
16/ By doing so, they can then claim that abortions aren't necessary for women's survival, even though, if defined traditionally, it is true that women regularly need them as a lifesaving measure.
18/ Despite posing as a respected scientific organization, their rejection by the wider medical community is not because they're seen as "persecuted heroes," but rather because they're wrong. That's the one explanation they never consider.
19/ Their influence in political circles is misleading. They accept invitations from elected officials that were not prompted by their expertise and knowledge, but for their predetermined stance and the sake of political theatre.
21/ Their narrative was comforting and reassuring, but because they gave me permission not to grapple with difficult topics that are rarely cut and dry. They made the issue simple. They told me a beautiful lie-- that the truth was plain and no one would get hurt.
22/ But in being deceived, I was hurting people who were facing those harsh realities, whatever they were. That is the reason I talk about this experience, even though it's embarrassing to say I was misled, even though I'm afraid of what people will think of me.
23/ This group's influence serves as a poignant example of how misinformation and deception can sway public opinion and shape policy. How they can lead people to have a stance they wouldn't hold if they could see all information clearly. Preventing that is the aim.
24/ And no, it's not just the US. When children no longer die (mostly thanks to sanitation and vaccines), women have fewer children. It has always been this way--legal abortion or contraception or not.