Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn, Threads, & Mastodon at the same time, in one click.
Make it punchier 👊
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion 🙏
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators love Typefully
180,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Köhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
🙈 Distraction-free
✍️ Write-only Twitter
🧵 Effortless threads
📈 Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
We’ve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If you’re still tweeting from Twitter you’re wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully 😍
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Writing prompts & personalized post ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
THE ITALIAN 110% SCHEME
Italy is wasting the money of Europeans on a poorly-designed scheme to improve the energetic efficiency of its buildings at excessive costs (up to 85%+ of building value) and earthquake resistance of buildings in areas with no earthquake risk.
Thread
First, an example. I know of an apartment valued at 95k€ ($108k) for which the Italian government is paying for a 81k€ ($92k) intervention to improve energetic efficiency and re-do the facade. That’s 85% of the house value. The cost for the landlord: 650€ ($740).
How does the scheme work?
The Italian government reimburses up to 110% of the costs to improve the energy efficiency of a building.
Why 110%? Because 100% go to the landlord to cover construction costs and 10% to cover financing costs.
In theory, the government pays this bonus as a tax credit.
But in practice, landlord can sell their tax credits to the construction company, who in turn sells them to banks.
The result: the landlord doesn't need to spend a penny AND HAS THEREFORE NO INCENTIVE TO KEEP COSTS LOW
The ultimate result is that e.g. the building of the example above, which contains 150+ apartments, commissioned works for almost 18 million Euros without asking for multiple quotes nor negotiating on prices.
Are the works worth it? They should reduce energy consumption by about 40%. Given that the building's yearly heating expenses was about 148k€ in 2020, the works have a break-even of 122 years if prices keep constant, or 61 years if they permanently double.
I understand it's not all about the Return on Investment & that it's important to keep energy consumption low.
But the question is not whether the billions used for this scheme will achieve positive results. It's whether they could have achieved better results if used elsewhere
The funding for the scheme and the laymen workforce to implement it are limited. Therefore, the government should ensure that it's used on the buildings where we get the most energy saved for the money spent.
Sadly, there is no such cost-benefit consideration.
The only requirement for the scheme is to improve a building's energy efficiency by at least two classes (in a scale from G to A+++)
But works that cost 10M€ to improve efficiency from A+ to A+++ (saving 0.4 kWh/m2) have the same priority of a 1M€ intervention to improve from G to E (saving 40 kWh/m2)
(assuming same # of apartments)
There are limits to the funding, for example, 30k€ per apartment in a large building. But it's easy to go around them. How?
For example, additional funding can be asked if the works also make the building less vulnerable to earthquakes (up to 96k€ per apartment).
This would make sense, except that buildings in low-seismic risk areas can request the full 96k€.
This is nonsense. As funding is limited, it should be directed towards buildings in high risk areas.
Instead, for example…
Until 2019, my town had the lowest-seismic-risk label (a 4 in scale from 4, low, to 1, high). In 2020, it got upgraded to 3, and all buildings in areas 3+ can ask for the full funding.
So I can e.g. ask for up to 96k€ to improve my building, even though there's little risk.
To summarize: the Italian government is using funding, AFAIK partly European and partly national, to finance works with no cost-benefit consideration whatsoever, with enormous opportunity costs.
I'm not against subsidies. They have uses, both to improve sustainability and to stimulate the economy.
But I'm against subsidies with no incentive for those using them to keep costs low and with no cost-benefit considerations.
Why is the Italian government doing this? Some would say corruption, but I think it's simply that this scheme benefits landlords due to real estate appreciation, and I suppose that most parliament members are landlords.
I'm raising a red flag now because many Italian landlords are submitting now the requests to get access to this funding before starting the works, so we're still in time to prevent a gigantic waste of money that could be better spent with a better-designed scheme.