Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn & Mastodon too. More platforms coming soon.
Make it punchier 👊
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion 🙏
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators love Typefully
150,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Köhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
🙈 Distraction-free
✍️ Write-only Twitter
🧵 Effortless threads
📈 Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
We’ve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If you’re still tweeting from Twitter you’re wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully 😍
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Writing prompts & personalized post ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
One of the biggest challenges liberalism faces is the distressingly widespread presence of a psychological aversion to dynamism. This is a chief motivator of the reactionary mindset, and explains a lot of the rise of populism, including Trumpism's takeover of the GOP.
"Traditional" cultural preferences can't remain hegemonic in a world of robust individual freedom and economic dynamism, but are instead subject to a process of creative destruction. Yet lots of people have a psychological disposition to feel threatened by cultural dynamism.
We shouldn't be too quick to see this psychological aversion to cultural dynamism as only present on the right. It's there on the left too, most notably among NIMBYs who veto new housing and increased economic diversity by saying we need to maintain the "neighborhood character."
On both sides, people opposed to cultural dynamism because they find it threatening or even just distasteful don't offer that as their reason for opposing increased freedoms that would accelerate cultural change. Rather, they offer "reasonable" objections—that don't hold up.
Opponents of gay marriage don't argue against it on grounds that they are uncomfortable with same-sex relationships. Rather, they offer bad arguments that gay marriage will harm children and undermine family bonds.
Opponents of increased density don't argue against it on grounds that they don't want lower income neighbors. Rather, they offer bad arguments about traffic patterns and school capacity.
Within the libertarian movement, arguments against cultural dynamism take the form of claiming that "traditional" values and social patterns are necessary underpinnings of a free society, and so we're justified in exercising power to maintain them in the cause of liberty.
I'm skeptical of this "libertarian conservative" argument against social dynamism because while obviously some moral values are needed for people to live together in an environment of liberty, the actual values conservatives tend to point to don't seem necessary at all.
For example, I'm not convinced we need "Christian values" for liberty to thrive, but Christians are certainly more comfortable in an environment where their beliefs and preferences dominate. And using power to enforce values and beliefs ought to require a high evidentiary burden.
Similarly, I'm not convinced we need to make everyone behave as if they support same-sex relationships in order for same-sex couples to have robust freedom. The state punishing a bake shop owner for not making a cake for a gay wedding ought to require a high evidentiary burden.
The point is that "culture" and "values" have always been dynamic, diverse, shot through with contradictions, and upsetting to someone or other. Saying "My preferred culture and values are necessary for society to thrive" is almost always contradicted by the evidence.
People want to be free, and we should let them, and encourage them in pursing that freedom, even in ways that might make us uncomfortable, or that we wouldn't choose for ourselves. "Traditional" values are always contingent preferences of some subgroup, never the whole group.
If a moral rule or cultural value genuinely is necessary for the promotion or continuation of liberty, we should embrace it on those grounds. We shouldn't see mere "tradition" as strong evidence of that, however, because tradition has often opposed diverse liberty.
And we shouldn't let mere psychological distaste, by some, for cultural dynamism stand in the way of people's autonomy and right to live their lives in ways of their choosing, so long as they respect others' right to do the same.