Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn & Mastodon too. More platforms coming soon.
Make it punchier 👊
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion 🙏
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators love Typefully
150,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Köhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
🙈 Distraction-free
✍️ Write-only Twitter
🧵 Effortless threads
📈 Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
We’ve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If you’re still tweeting from Twitter you’re wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully 😍
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Writing prompts & personalized post ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
This problem I pointed out earlier, that political philosophy spends too much time on HOW to use state coercive power instead of asking whether that power SHOULD be used, has troubling consequences far beyond the halls of the academy. So here's a thread. twitter.com/ARossP/status/1402426047954620417
We need to start by being clear about what the state is. Governments are, at their most basic level, institutions to enable and empower some people to use coercive force, backed by threats of violence, against others. Everything else they do is just trappings on top of that.
The state is an enforced power relationship, a hierarchy that grants some authority over others, and backs that authority with force. Even if we think the state is necessary, and even if we like what it does, it's still, at its heart, a relationship of unequal power.
Democracy attempts to spread the power and flatten the disparity, so that authority is held—or at least subject to the will of—the citizens. This makes it obviously better than authoritarianism, where coercive authority is concentrated and total. But it doesn't change its nature.
Thus every time we have the state take action, even those we believe are good and just, we take advantage of that power relationship, where the powerful compel the relatively powerless to do what they want, and with the threat of violence behind their commands.
Every institution we create and support as part of that government, no matter how noble its purpose, is built upon a foundation of some people getting violent power to make others comply with their commands.
If philosophers ask only how to use state power instead of starting with—or even acknowledging—a critique of it, then we normalize relationships wherein some people get to use violence against others. Our lack of critique sends the message that there's nothing wrong with them.
But, of course there is much wrong with relationships where some get to use violence against others. Even if we think they're necessary, and can be put to good use, we still shouldn't like them, and we should see them as an aberration from the way moral people ought to act.
If philosophy just assumes the morality of a relationship of command and violence in the context of the state, then we'll be less likely to look for, or take seriously, non-state, non-violent alternatives.
People who live in an environment where such relationships of violence are considered not only acceptable, but just and cause for celebration, will start to think maybe relationships of violence are okay outside of the state context, too.
So, philosophers, please, even if you're going to ultimately come down on the side of the necessity of state power to advance justice, take a moment to examine just what that power is—and what it says about how it's okay to treat each other.