Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn & Mastodon too. More platforms coming soon.
Make it punchier 👊
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion 🙏
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators love Typefully
150,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Köhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
🙈 Distraction-free
✍️ Write-only Twitter
🧵 Effortless threads
📈 Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
We’ve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If you’re still tweeting from Twitter you’re wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully 😍
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Writing prompts & personalized post ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
BETTER THAN FLOW EFFICIENCY
We know FLOW EFFICIENCY is more powerful than RESOURCE EFFICIENCY.
Results are so spectacular!
You might be content and not compelled to improve further.
After all, we did discover that FLOW EFFICIENCY is the key to make incredible improvements.
As we did conducting "The Magic Wand Experiment."
twitter.com/tendon/status/1524978237692006400
Could there be anything that sustains even more the outrageous claims I did?
With FLOW EFFICIENCY we have already seen it is possible!
twitter.com/tendon/status/1524306595995262976
But we can do even better, and sustain the Outrageous Claim in an even more powerful way.
Be introduced to THROUGHPUT EFFICIENCY!
Just as FLOW EFFICIENCY trumps RESOURCE EFFICIENCY, THROUGHPUT EFFICIENCY trumps FLOW EFFICIENCY.
Let's find out how it might look like.
WHICH PRODUCT SHOULD WE SELL?
Let's consider a simple example.
We have four products: A, B, C and D.
They will be sold respectively for 50, 50, 55 and 52 dollars.
The question we want to answer is: which product should we produce and sell to make the greatest profit?
Note: this is a "manufacturing" example.
You might believe that this does not apply to knowledge-work.
Remember how we work in TameFlow.
We use MENTAL MODELS to gain deeper insights about reality.
This is another MENTAL MODEL.
Maybe it applies to knowledge-work too?
COMPUTE UNIT PROFIT
We need more information to make the decision.
If we can get data in the form of production times, material costs and labor costs, then we will be able to compute the unit profit.
The unit profits are respectively: $24.00, $18.67, $24.17 and $26.17.
PICK THE HIGHEST UNIT PROFIT
Now the decision can be made.
Obviously we will pick product D, the one with the highest unit profit.
Don't we all agree that it makes sense to maximize the unit profit?
Not so fast...
BEWARE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The stated objective is to maximize profits
Different KPIs create conflicting interests.
Sales will push the product with the highest price, for the commissions.
Production the one with highest resource efficiency.
We have hidden agendas!
Interesting questions:
1. Can we make more money for the company selling some other product that is NOT the one with the highest unit profit?
2. Can we resolve those hidden conflicts and create common interests across the roles?
"Impossible!" most will say, to either!
BREAKDOWN THE PROCESS
Who's working?
Mr. Green and Mr. Gray.
See which activities they perform (in this case, assemble or work on the components/raw materials).
Note the order or sequence of the activities.
Map this out for each product.
MEASURE FLOW TIMES / PER WORKER
Measure how much time ("Flow Time") each of them employ to perform each activity.
What stands out is that, no matter which product is being put together, Mr. Green consistently takes more time than Mr. Gray.
Is this significant?
IDENTIFY THE CONSTRAINT
We have found the CONSTRAINT IN THE WORK PROCESS.
(We colloquially refer to the Constraint as "Herbie")
It is Mr. Green, precisely because he always needs more time than Mr. Gray.
Mr. Green is always the "slowest."
OPERATIONAL THROUGHPUT PER DAY FOR EACH PRODUCT
What does it mean that Mr. Green is the Constraint?
The system can never produce more than what "Herbie" does!
We can compute the maximum number of units per day, for each product, relative only to the capacity of "Herbie."
NET PROFIT PER DAY / FOR EACH PRODUCT
If we know the maximum number of units per day, we can also calculate the NET PROFIT PER DAY for each product.
We do this calculation with the simple equations of THROUGHPUT ACCOUNTING.
Now something really surprising stands out...
WHICH IS THE MOST PROFITABLE PRODUCT NOW?
We see that product A, that nobody cared about, is really the one that will give us the most "bang for the buck!"
It will produce +59% more DAILY NET PROFIT compared to product D which had the highest unit profit!
Unbelievable!
Reflect on what happened here.
The product that conventional thinking deems is providing the highest (unit) profit, does NOT make the most money for the company.
It is counter-intuitive, isn't it.
It is another Egg of Columbus!
And what was the burden to the company?
HOW MUCH DID THIS IMPROVEMENT "COST?"
We sustained no investment, no hiring, no purchasing of assets, no restructuring, no reorganization, no retraining, no overtime, no additional data (besides what was available).
We changed nothing, except a decision.
We had zero risk!
NO BIG DATA. NO DATA NOR COGNITIVE LOAD.
You might believe that to make such decisions you need lost of data - "Big Data."
But compare the dataset supporting the cost accounting decision making compared to the one of throughput accounting.
They are both the same size!
THE GREATER BENEFIT: UNITY OF PURPOSE AND COMMUNITY OF TRUST
In all this, there is even a greater benefit.
Imagine that all KPIs, of all roles, are aimed at the maximization of FINANCIAL THROUGHPUT.
We will have a SINGLE METRIC that drives all activities, no matter who!
Not only will this kind of decisions make the company much more profitable, but it will foster the UNITY OF PURPOSE and a COMMUNITY OF TRUST.
Conflicts of interests and hidden agendas, will be replaced by shared interests and actions that all pull in the same direction.
If you want to see how these ideas can be used in knowledge -work, and in particular software engineering management, check my latest book:
"Standing on Bits, Agile Software Engineering Management at Scale with the Theory of Constraints."
leanpub.com/standingonbits