Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn & Mastodon too. More platforms coming soon.
Make it punchier 👊
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion 🙏
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators love Typefully
150,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Köhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
🙈 Distraction-free
✍️ Write-only Twitter
🧵 Effortless threads
📈 Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
We’ve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If you’re still tweeting from Twitter you’re wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully 😍
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Writing prompts & personalized post ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
THE MAGIC WAND EXPERIMENT
Besides telling stories, another tool we use in TameFlow to explore and understand our MENTAL MODELS are "Gedankenexperiments," that is, "thought experiments."
We will look at such an experiment now, the Magic Wand Experiment.
The experiments starts with this question:
If I gave you a magic wand that could reduce by 20% anything you point it at, how would you use it?
Most business would have no doubt: let's make things happen faster.
Which means they would aim the wand at reducing TIME by 20%.
Let's make some considerations.
FIRST! Most businesses are not aware of the distinction between TOUCH TIME and WAIT TIME.
When they think about "making things happen faster," that invariably means "work harder."
So, more specifically, they would aim the wand at TOUCH TIME.
It makes sense after all.
In the hospital metaphor: if we want to "deliver" more healthy patients, the doctors must "TOUCH" them faster - do their work in less time.
The "resources" have to become more "efficient."
This is the essence of the RESOURCE EFFICIENCY paradigm.
Because of this ruling view - the RESOURCE EFFICIENCY, "work harder," paradigm - and the fact that there is no awareness or consideration about the distinction between TOUCH and WAIT TIME, any improvement effort will be aimed at TOUCH TIME REDUCTION.
You must "work harder!"
SECOND! Another obvious effect of improving on TOUCH TIME is it implies sustaining costs, changes and risk of failure.
Think about it.
The doctors must operate "faster!"
They must change the way of working; hire more nurses; buy better equipment.
And risk failing!
If we reduce WAIT TIME without changing TOUCH TIME, then there are no material changes to perform.
The doctors would still be operating as before.
No additional nurses need to be hired or trained.
No further equipment is needed.
And without change, risk of failure is gone!
THIRD! If we reduce WAIT TIME, we are effectively pursuing what is known as FLOW EFFICIENCY.
It can be thought of as "deliver sooner" in contrast to "work harder" of RESOURCE EFFICIENCY.
It can be measured as the ratio between the sum of all TOUCH TIMES over the TOTAL TIME.
Strikingly, FLOW EFFICIENCY is extremely low in the context of knowledge-work.
Unless it has been deliberately addressed, it will typically fall between the 3-7% range.
Let's say 5% for arguments sake.
What does it mean?
95% of the time the "patient" will be waiting!
Now, with these three factors in mind...
1. We are aware of WAIT TIME
2. If we improve WAIT TIME, there are no costs, changes or risk
3. Flow efficiency is low, like 5%
... let's ask the experiment question again.
Where do we aim the wand at?
WAIT TIME or TOUCH TIME?
The answer is obvious.
It makes much more sense to aim at WAIT TIME.
But how much better is it, really?
If we calculate how much more gets done, we see the difference: a 1% improvement (via TOUCH TIME) vs a 23% improvement (via WAIT TIME).
Surprised?
It's even worse!
That 1% will probably be eroded by the effort to improve on TOUCH TIME.
It will be eroded by the costs and changes, and it will most likely fail.
And because it fails, it will cause another chase of the next "improvement initiative," effectively triggering a vicious circle!
But is yet even more worse!
Because if the TOUCH TIME improves by 20%, operations are patting themselves on their back, celebrating how good they are!
But business will NOT see any financial improvement.
A 1% eroded by the cost and risk of change.
Business will scratch their heads, and wonder why they don't see results
And they will kick off another "improvement initiative," notwithstanding the "success!"
So the change cycle starts over even so, making everyone frustrated yet again.
FLOW EFFICIENCY improvements, on the other hand, would yield a +23% of real performance gains, which likely would be outstandingly reflected in the business results.
So with this thought experiment, there is no doubt.
FLOW EFFICIENCY trumps RESOURCE EFFICIENCY.
Did you like this reasoning about FLOW EFFICIENCY and its effect on improvement and business results?
You can read more about such ideas in my book: The Book of TameFlow!
You can find it here:
leanpub.com/tameflow