Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn & Mastodon too. More platforms coming soon.
Make it punchier 👊
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion 🙏
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators love Typefully
150,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Köhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
🙈 Distraction-free
✍️ Write-only Twitter
🧵 Effortless threads
📈 Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
We’ve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If you’re still tweeting from Twitter you’re wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully 😍
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Writing prompts & personalized post ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
There's an excellent video by Nicolas Brown about "How (agile) charts lie." See:
circle.tameflow.com/c/conversations/how-agile-charts-lie
In one section of the video Nicolas expresses deep concerns about the use of Flow Efficiency.
Kevin, one of my community members asked me how "I might help a client get comfortable with the notion of Flow Efficiency assuming they had similar concerns to those Nic raised."
I wouldn't! And here is my full reply:
First, Nic has a concern with the Flow Efficiency Chart. (That is Flow Efficiency over time.)
Please note well: there is not a single page in my books or in my posts where I ever suggest to use Flow Efficiency Charts. In this I agree with Nic that they are not very useful. And it makes absolutely no sense to talk about "average" FE, which is an abomination.
So if anyone is suggesting to use the Flow Efficiency Chart or to use Average Flow Efficiency as a metric, I would say that your client is correct in being very skeptical. In fact they should not use them!
Note well: In general I advise not to use FE as a metric! Though knowing about it, and how to calculate it (correctly) can be very beneficial, because...
Second, I use FE primarily as a Mental Model… to make people think that there is actually "work waiting for workers” inside their system. If you present FE from this perspective, you can give a business reason for why it is important to address that situation.
See my example on page 64 of The Book of TameFlow, or (more funnily) my Twitter thread about 'The Magic Wand Experiment.' There you will have a very convincing argument for why businesses should focus on reducing Wait Time rather than Touch Time.
twitter.com/tendon/status/1524978237692006400
Notice that those two are components of FE. So if you attend to the right part of FE, you can get a lot more juice... while if you attend to the wrong part, you will be losing money.
Third, I use the Flow Efficiency Board both to make it explicit when work is waiting for people, and also as a psychological driver. Again, this is explained in The Book of TameFlow.
In theory, there is no great difference between a Kanban [Doing/Done] column split, and a Flow Efficiency Board's [Waiting for.../... in Process] column split. For any running process, the FE will be the same... But practically the impact is huge.
How do you feel when you read "X is waiting for Kevin" rather than "Kevin is done with X." Which gives a stronger bias to action? You see, we don't care so much about measuring FE.
We care much more about creating the behavioral responses and attitudes that foster higher levels of performance.
In conclusion: while you can measure FE, don't waste any effort in doing so. Instead pickup the Mental Model that underlies the idea of FE, and help people to make operational decisions based on that Mental Model.
You will improve because of the improved understanding, decision making, behaviors and attitudes you develop in the teams - not because you're chasing a metric.