Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn, Threads, & Mastodon at the same time, in one click.
Make it punchier 👊
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion 🙏
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators love Typefully
180,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Köhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
🙈 Distraction-free
✍️ Write-only Twitter
🧵 Effortless threads
📈 Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
We’ve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If you’re still tweeting from Twitter you’re wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully 😍
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Writing prompts & personalized post ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
Poor project management wastes $122 million for every $1 billion spent globally.
I've taught 100s, advised 10s of firms, helped develop worldwide project management standards, and led multimillion-dollar projects on three continents.
1 secret strategy I always used 👇
The secret is:
Choosing the best project approach.
Which could be one of these:
1. Heavy (Traditional, Plan-driven, Waterfall)
2. Light (Agile, Adaptive).
3. Blend (Hybrid of the two.)
Construction should be heavy and software light, but what about other projects?
Use these 5 guidelines to figure out which approach to use:
1. Requirements Stability
2. Organization Culture
3. Team Size
4. Failure Consequences
5. Workers skills level
1/ Requirements Stability
Choose a heavy approach if few requirements are changing.
Light approach is better when there are many changes.
Hybrid is the best option if you're in the middle.
Indicator:
% of requirement change requests per month:
1% to 5% requirements change, go heavy.
5% to 30% requirements change: Hybrid.
30% to 50% requirements change: light approach.
2/ Organization Culture
If self-managed employees say they require a boss because they thrive in a command-and-control setting, then a project with a plan is best (heavy).
Do they like autonomy? Then choose a light approach.
Indicator:
% of employees who thrive on chaos vs order
10% to 30% = Heavy
30% to 50% = Hybrid
50% to 90% = Light
3/ Team Size
If you have a big team, you should follow a plan.
If you have a small team, it's better to be flexible and light.
Indicator:
# of personnel
200 to 500 = Heavy
10 to 200 = Hybrid
0 to 9 = Light
4/ Failure Consequences
If lives are at stake, then, a heavy plan driven approach is needed.
Comfortable failing forward and fast? Then light approach is better.
Measure:
Losses due to impact of defects
Many lives to single lives = Plan-driven
Essential funds = Hybrid
Discretionary to Comfort funds = light.
5/ Workers skills level
If low skill workers are more than high skill workers, then, plan driven approach is better.
A team of smarts? Then adaptive approach is better.
Indicator:
% of people with low skills versus % of people with high skills
30 Low and 20 High to 40 Low and 15 High = Heavy
20 Low and 25 High = Hybrid
From Zero Low and 35 High to 10 Low and 30 High = Light
What if you have a large team, but all other 4 guidelines say go light?
Answer: Break the large team into smaller teams.
Tools: Scaled Agile, Scrum of Scrums, etc.
And you do the same thing with other measurements, when most guidelines point towards the opposite approach.
We either act on adjusting the remaining few guidelines, or we go hybrid.
TL;DR
You go heavy on projects when:
1/ It's a large team
2/ Lives are at stake
3/ Few requirements are changing
4/ Low skill workers are more than high skill workers
5/ Self-managed employees fail; they need a manager.
If not, choose the light approach!
This thread is based on the papers and body of knowledge from the Project Management Institute (PMI's PMBOK).
To which I've contributed to the last two releases, as well as the work break down structure practice standards.