Specifically, Bloomberg recently published an analysis on how 9 content creators captured this audience and gave Trump and other far-right personalities a platform to reach them. Let's take a look at how they did it.
bloomberg.com/graphics/2025-youtube-podcast-men-for-trump/
First, these 9 content creators did not explicitly bill themselves as political analysts. Their podcasts typically cover a broad range of topics sports, masculinity, internet culture, gambling and pranks, which made them palatable to an apolitical audience.
How large were their audiences? Joe Rogan reportedly has around 14.5 million listeners on Spotify. Logan Paul, around 23 million; Lex Fridman, around 4.5 million. These figures can vary depending on which website you consult.
Interestingly, these 9 youtubers also did not feature explicitly political guests on their show until near the date of the actual elections.
However, these nine Youtubers would occasionally sandwich political topics which would appeal to young male voters, and to the Trump demographic at large-- masculinity, traditional gender roles, criticisms of transgender identity, vaccine skepticism, immigration, inflation.
These points appealed resonated with a young male demographic portrayed as "victims of a Democratic campaign to strip them of their power"- a feeling validated by studies such as Equimundo’s 2023 State of American Men.
Which melds well with the next point. In the United States, these 9 youtubers fostered an "us vs them" mentality among their audience. This quote from a co-host of the Impaulsive podcast illustrates the point well.
Thus, when these podcasters finally invited Trump to appear, he spoke to an audience seething with resentment. Rogan's interview drew 50 million views; Altogether, the nine episodes with Trump as a guest drew more than 100 million views.
However, the difference between the US context and ours is our lack of polarizing talking points. Partisanship in our country is still largely personality based (Marcos vs Duterte vs Risa/Leni), as opposed to the non-negotiable culture wars being fought in the US.
Like the Trump nine, there has to be a wider effort to build and engage audiences beyond elections and campaigns- while subtly reading and tapping into issues that can galvanize resentment and mobilization.
Actually, this may be why buying pre-existing FB groups has become a key tactic. It may also partially explain the rise of the Tulfos. They handle issues of justice and accountability in their own way, while avoiding technical language and political sparring.
Consequently, it goes beyond celebrity endorsements and "voter's education". Both are weapons from yesteryear's wars. It's all about getting ahead of the curve.