1/14 For those who wonder why I am pretty sure that Ian Lipkin was a CIA mole in the Proximal Origin team, I'll just paraphrase Lipkin and say that it's 'obvious'.
It's so funny the way he screwed it up,
#DRASTIC @Jerdman2005
2/14 Lipkin answered too quickly, as it was obvious to him since he was the mole.
He realized the mistake, stopped on the C and tried to land on his feet.
The best is that this was not redacted (since he stopped on the C).
Just like Baric and BSEC for BSEG: you just need a mistake to get the truth.
3/14 Here is the moment the CIA came and rang on the door to get their mole into the Proximal Origin team.
At that time, the overall objective was to get access to China.
@JeremyFarrar @DrTedros
4/14 The best CIA asset was Baric, who listened silently.
Next best - since Baric can’t obviously be co-author - was Lipkin, a good fireside friend of him and with a very long relation with the IC.
5/14 Why on earth do you think Lipkin got to join the co-authors so late?
He even pointed to the concerns of the IC and ‘higher ups’ when he first talked to Holmes before being cleared by Farrar.
6/14 So Baric and Lipkin both perfectly knew what a narrative product P.O. was (for the benefit of access to China).
Then the CIA grilled Fauci on 4 June 2021
Fauci thought that something was very 'fishy'.
Well, sure.
7/14 Something which had to stop to maintain the narrative, by now political (Trump MUST be wrong).
So Beth Cameron (A Global Health Security actor) arranged for a presentation by Fauci to the IC on 7 July.
8/14 Then rather stupidly Daszak’s Coalition (inc Rasmussen), plus the PO authors (ex Lipkin obviously), plus Worobey and Crist-Cristoph, rushed their ‘Critical Review’ to a no-delay preprint the exact day Fauci was back in front of the IC (7 July), but this time with Cameron firmly in charge.
9/14 Immediately Folkers, who is part of the Daszak little cabal with Morens and has a Master in Journalism, sent the preprint Bitly link he had just created to Fauci (as he was just leaving the IC meeting).
10/14 Fauci then forwarded the preprint the next day to recommend these wonderful card-carrying scientists.
Just what Cameron wanted to get things back on track.
11/14 The CIA - which obviously knew better too - kept pushing and was put back in line. Hence the whistle-blowing there.
Since then @CIADirector has been a bit coy, because admitting having a mole in the P.O. authors team complicates things .
12/14 So full of themselves, and not really bright, all these scientists thought they were backing a sure horse, not realizing the game that got played in February 2020.
They craved the fame and got very defensive when exposed.
Let them stew.
And that includes you @angie_rasmussen.
13/14 More here on the "Critical Review" push to the IC via Folkers and Fauci:
typefully.com/gdemaneuf/B2LbfcU
Gilles Demaneuf
@gdemaneuf
Pointy Head. Opinions, analyses and views expressed are purely mine and should not in any way be characterised as representing any institution or company.