1/4 At the end of 2021, I gave an interview to a French newspaper where I carefully explained how the available data and the clear risk factors pointed to a research accident in Wuhan.
@DrJMarine @HansMahncke @SenRandPaul @SenRonJohnson #DRASTIC @ladepechedumidi
2/4 I gave a 70-75% probability, which today is accepted as reasonable by true experts (not conflicted shills, political hacks ands the like).
I was called a conspiracy theorist then.
@radionz wanted to investigate me, according to Eddie Holmes.
www-ladepeche-fr.translate.goog/2021/11/06/origine-du-covid-19-la-probabilite-dun-accident-de-laboratoire-a-wuhan-est-de-70-a-75-9912892.php?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp
3/4 - The German intel services eventually settled for 80%.
- The main intelligence services in the US (those with true experts depth) are all leaning research accident.
- The French Academy of Sciences has also leaned towards it.
But some things never change:
@StuffNZ @NZStuff @winstonpeters
Gilles Demaneuf
@gdemaneuf
Pointy Head. Opinions, analyses and views expressed are purely mine and should not in any way be characterised as representing any institution or company.