Typefully

Controversial Nature Communications Claims

Avatar

Share

 • 

2 days ago

 • 

View on X

1/6 How @NatureComms ended up printing illegal Chinese territorial and sea claims. @Byron_Wan @SenRandPaul #DRASTIC
2/6 I was quite shocked when I first saw that figure, with the dangling illegal China claim to the South China Sea which added absolutely nothing to the figure! Red annotations are mine. Pure illegal sea claims for free, sponsored by the NIH. @DrJBhattacharya @JamieMetzl @SecKennedy @TheSeeker268
3/6 By the way, that's also the paper that was retracted and republished at the same time without the Laos samples, so as to not have to publish the reviews of the attempted Addendum. From Daszak's calendar:
4/6 Why? Because the Laos samples were illegally sampled via a quick trip across the border, without any authorisation and no PREDICT default IACUC (required when a local one is not available). That was done under Metabiota before China got transferred to EHA portfolio, and EHA did not notice these.
5/6 See: researchgate.net/publication/395016679_Findings_from_EHA_documents_made_public_by_Congress_in_December_2024_-DRASTIC_Working_Notes_-_PREVIEW_LINKS_REMOVED
Avatar

Gilles Demaneuf

@gdemaneuf

Pointy Head. Opinions, analyses and views expressed are purely mine and should not in any way be characterised as representing any institution or company.