Castle Research presents Smart Accounts: A New Era for UX

✦ The Wallet Problem
✦ From EOAs to Smart Accounts@pedrouid
✦ ERC-4337 and Account Abstraction
✦ Wallet Landscape Comparison
✦ Risks of Smart Wallets
✦ Future of Wallets

https://chronicle.castlecapital.vc/p/smart-accounts-a-new-era-for-ux

This year we have witnessed awe-inspiring growth across infrastructure development and institutional adoption, but we can all agree we are way behind on user experience (UX).

In this rapidly evolving world, if we are ever to onboard the next million onchain users, we must face the UX problem head-on.

Smart wallets are here to do just that.

➼ How do smart wallets work?
➼ What are the risks?
➼ How can they revolutionize EVM onchain experiences?

Throughout the report, we have created simplified tables and infographics that simplify your education in smart accounts and the future they enable.

Here are some of the smart wallet providers we dive into: @CoinbaseWallet @safe @AmbireWallet @elytro_eth  @argentHQ @erc4337 

EOA → Smart Wallet Transition

Account abstraction enables wallets to leverage smart contracts instead of EOAs, providing enhanced security, social recovery, flexibility, gas abstraction, and the ability to batch complex DeFi actions into a single transaction.

ERC-4337 Adoption and Stats

Since the launch of ERC-4337 in March 2023, nearly 20 million AA wallets have been created, processing over 100 million user operations (userOps), with nearly 90% sponsored by paymasters.

Security Best Practices

While account abstraction offers advanced features, it introduces contract-level risks, such as phishing, malicious modules, and potential backdoors. Thorough audits, well-structured guardian setups for social recovery, and trusted dApp integrations are critical for maintaining security.

Future of Account Abstraction

EIP-7702 could significantly improve user experience by allowing EOAs to temporarily execute smart contract code during transactions, unlocking many of the features currently exclusive to smart wallets.


Read the full report here:
https://chronicle.castlecapital.vc/p/smart-accounts-a-new-era-for-ux

Sharing with Abstraction Chads who might be interested:
@0xKofi 
@ox_shaman
@0xCygaar
@MonkeyMeaning
@norswap 
@kristofgazso
@SchorLukas
@econoar
@pedrouid
@agi_intern
@realgmhacker
@decentrek
@0xmitvh
@zengjiajun_eth 
@anthonykrose
@SeanMacAonghais
@PaulFrambot
@alexanderchopan
@BL0CKRUNNER
@AraBalaghi
@jessepollak 
@z0r0zzz
@abstractooor
@SimkinStepan
@vasa_develop
@anirudh_chohan

cc'ing some friends of Castle 🏰 
@thedailydegenhq 
@crypto_linn 
@ReveloIntel 
@TheiaResearch
@DegenSensei
@0xhuntingalpha
@TaikiMaeda2
@0xKepler
@0xPrismatic
@WinterSoldierxz
@rektdiomedes
@RiceMaximalist
@ayyyeandy
@TheDeFISaint
@0xSalazar
@poopmandefi
@hmalviya9
@stacy_muur 
@TrustlessState 
@DeFi_Cheetah 
@Slappjakke 
@CryptoKoryo 
@0xTindorr 
@0xMughal 
@DeFiMinty
@DeFi_Made_Here 
@DefiIgnas 

Building the next big thing in crypto? Whether you’re launching, growing, or scaling, Castle is the ecosystem partner you need

Let’s connect!

Smart Accounts: A New Era for UX

🚨 Attention @arbitrum Delegates, Users and Community Members

The LTIPP Snapshot Voting is LIVE for Applicants who were Recommended by the Council

Read on for a Summary of the data so far and make sure to leave your opinions for an improved process! 👇 

Overall:

✦ 173 Applicants ✉️ 
✦ 77 Recommended 👍 
✦ 85 Opposed 👎 
✦ 11 Withdrawals ❌ 

✦ 65.2M ARB Final Ask 💰 
✦ 26.4M ARB Recommended 👍 
✦ 38.8M ARB Opposed 👎 

* Initial Agreement = whether the initial 3 Council reviews were aligned

By Size:

✦ Very Large (1M+) = 20M Ask / 1.8M Recommended
✦ Large (500k - 1M) = 19.5M Ask / 10M Recommended
✦ Medium (100k - 500k) = 13M Ask / 9.9M Recommended
✦ Small (0 - 100k) = 3M Ask / 1M Recommended

By Advisor:

Consultations led to the ARB ask reducing from 152M to 65M (-60%)

Advisors are not decision-makers. Applications are reviewed by the Council.

✦ @castle__cap 🏰 = 55% Recommendation Rate
✦ @jojo17568 🐮 = 46% Rec. Rate
✦ @SEEDLatam 🟣 = 43% Rec. Rate

By Initial Council Reviews:

This focuses on the Initial Review (Votes 1-3):

✦ @404DAO = 60% Recommendation Rate
✦ @labsGFX = 35% Rec. Rate
✦ @GMX_IO = 58% Rec. Rate
✦ @karelvuong = 40% Rec. Rate
✦ @wintermute_t = 49% Rec. Rate

By Secondary Council Reviews:

This focuses on the Secondary Review (Votes 4-5), if required:

✦ @404DAO = 46% Recommendation Rate
✦ @labsGFX = 19% Rec. Rate
✦ @GMX_IO = 65% Rec. Rate
✦ @karelvuong = 58% Rec. Rate
✦ @wintermute_t = 38% Rec. Rate

By Votes:

✦ 0/3 (0%) = 55 Applicants / 25.5M ARB 👎 
✦ 1/4 (25%) = 19 Appl. / 5.1M ARB 👎
✦ 2/5 (40%) = 11 Appl./ 8.2M ARB 👎

✦ 2/4 (50%) = 2 Appl. / 282k ARB 👍 
✦ 3/5 (60%) = 8 Appl. / 2M ARB 👍
✦ 3/4 (75%) = 15 Appl. / 4.3M ARB 👍
✦ 3/3 (100%) = 52 Appl. / 19.7M ARB 👍

Go and Vote: https://snapshot.org/#/arbitrumfoundation.eth

Check out this LTIPP Resource and more: https://castlecapital.notion.site/LTIPP-Resource-c17427a5216f4ca9981d690edc5bc072?pvs=4

& h/t to @0xAtomist for being a Notion Formula nerd

Delegates:
@Treasure_DAO
@l2beat
@muxprotocol
@OlimpioCrypto
@thegrifft
@ChainLinkGod
@CamelotDEX
@Blockworks_
@0xfrisson
@coinflipcanada 
@0x_ultra 
@ercwl
@blockworksres
@UMichBlockchain
@Galxe
@brianfakhoury
@Cattin0x
@CUBlockchain
@DisruptionJoe
@dmihal
@sobylife
@litocoen 

Others:
@ReveloIntel
@threesigmaxyz
@TheiaResearch
@ajwarner90
@0xWenMoon
@SteakCapital
@DewhalesCapital
@RedactedRes
@getmoni_io 
@areta_io
@t__norm
@RnDAO__

ARDC:
@chaos_labs 
@OpenZeppelin
@Delphi_Digital 
@blockworksres 

The LTIPP is a pilot program and as such requires as much feedback as possible to improve the process! 

There is lots of data to dive into, so let us know your take on how the process has gone so far.

What are your thoughts on the results and how can things be improved?

LTIPP Snapshot Voting Update

Castle Capital needs your support! 🏰

We are currently applying as advisors for @arbitrum Long-Term Incentives Program (LTIP).

Like a knight tasked to defend its Castle, we are ready to do anything in our power to safeguard the Arbitrum ecosystem and slay the dragon that is… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1747573491925192927 

@arbitrum We had to write this double just to make sure it resonated 🤣🏰

Make sure to sign up for our free weekly newsletter:

https://chronicle.castlecapital.vc/

@arbitrum cc. our Arbitrum friends 🫡🏰

@ReveloIntel 
@TraderJoe_xyz 
@ryskfinance 
@BrahmaFi 
@coinflipcanada 
@litocoen 
@DavideFi_ 
@blueclarityone 
@PSYTWEAK 
@l2beat  
@ercwl  
@muxprotocol 
@blockworksres  
@UMichBlockchain  
@Galxe  
@labsGFX  
@brianfakhoury 
@Cattin0x… 

When it comes to building a blockchain there's no right or wrong - it's all about trade-offs ⚖️

Monolithic blockchains must face the "blockchain trilemma" and compromise between UX, security, and decentralization, while Modular blockchains can benefit from flexibility and… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1746961885541380566 

Castle modular frens:
@modularmedia_
@DailyGwei_TV
@zerokn0wledge_
@ayyyeandy
@therollupco
@TheDeFISaint
@0xSalazar
@poopmandefi
@monosarin
@ReveloIntel
@DegenSensei
@0xhuntingalpha
@TaikiMaeda2
@0xPrismatic
@WinterSoldierxz
@rektdiomedes
@thedailydegenhq
@RiceMaximalist

🏰 Research Report  🏰

The Evolution of Liquidity Provision: A Deep Dive into DeFi's Architectural Plumbing 🌊🔍

A must read for anyone who regularly uses DEXs, or is an LP 💦

Written by our very own @SquigsCat

Full article linked below! 📚👇

🏰 CHECK OUT OUR FULL PUBLICATION BELOW 🏰

https://chronicle.castlecapital.vc/p/evolution-liquidity-provision-deep-dive-defis-architectural-plumbing

Our exploration begins with the evolution of Automated Market Makers (AMMs) in DeFi.

Pioneered by platforms like @Uniswap, @CurveFinance, and @Balancer, AMMs marked a shift from traditional order books to liquidity pools - beginning the transition of liq/trading on-chain  🔄📘


AMMs enabled permissionless trading, allowing anyone to trade assets on an algorithmic price curve 🆓

This was a groundbreaking step, democratizing public access to market making and trading alike. 🌍🔓


However, constant product market makers (CPMMs) present challenges, notably impermanent loss (IL).

This arises as LP assets are continually rebalanced to maintain a 50/50 ratio 📉 ⚖️

To improve LP flexibility and reduce idle liquidity, @Uniswap pioneered Concentrated Liquidity AMMs via their v3 🎛️🚦

CLAMMs provide LPs with:
✅ Greater control over positions (defined price range)
✅ Optimized capital efficiency
❌ Higher complexity, IL risk



For retail LPs, particularly non-directional ones, participating in concentrated liquidity (CL) is often unprofitable and elevates IL risk.

This is a key consideration in DeFi's liquidity landscape as most LPs are not sophisticated enough to remain consistently profitable 📉 💸

Advanced LPs have found ways to mitigate these risks 🌱

For example, using LP positions as a form of limit order, gigabrain LPs can align their strategy with their market predictions, reducing IL and capturing more fees.

For a deeper dive into this  ⬇️

https://crocswap.medium.com/unraveling-a-puzzle-a-per-wallet-analysis-of-eth-usdc-liquidity-on-uniswap-v3-a00b0f836ac3

Take the example of a directional long bias on $ETH price 📈

By adding out-of-range $ETH only, LP above the current price and actively managing the position as price increases (limit sell on rips & buy dips), LPs can significantly lower their IL risk while still capturing fees.


Automated Liquidity Management (ALM) emerges as a solution to these complexities.

ALMs, like @GammaSwapLabs and @ichifoundation dynamically rebalance LP ranges with price movements, optimizing the benefits of CL while ​​minimizing risk to passive LPs.

A win-win! 🤝

Platforms like @mavprotocol offer native strategies for price directionality, allowing LPs to take a directional bias when entering a position.

This introduces a novel approach to liquidity p​​rovision in DeFi 💡

An example is seen with Maverick Protocol's "mode left" and "mode right."

These modes allow LPs to align their liquidity with their market predictions, such as anticipating price declines or increases in the assets they LP.

More passive LPs can also use the "mode both" ⚖️

@TraderJoe_xyz Auto-Pools and @ThenaFi_ ALM vaults provide another example.

These pools offer a one-click method for LPs to add reserves, which are then managed by automated rebalancing strategies, simplifying the​​ LP experience for end-users ✅

The evolution of DeFi liquidity models also highlights a significant trend: the necessity for LPs to be more strategic and active in their approach to maximize profitability and minimize risk 👀

This trend raises important questions about the accessibility of DeFi for average users.

While advanced systems offer greater control, they also require a deeper understanding of market dynamics and active engagement 🧠 ⬅️

In line with this, a paradigm shift is occurring with the integration of On- & Off-chain Liq Solutions 🤝

Professional market makers are now being combined with on-chain LPs, aiming to offer optimal pricing & minimal slippage.

This may be a "best of both worlds" approach 🌐🔀

This integration is exemplified through the Request for Quote (RFQ) system, which uses a 🇳🇱 Dutch auction mechanism to ensure competitive pricing, resistance to MEV, and often, gasless trades 📊🔗

Some Protocols to keep an eye on:
@CoWSwap @hashflow @1inch @paraswap

Another intriguing approach involves on-chain order books, as seen in platforms like @vertex_protocol 🌪️

This model represents a blend of traditional and decentralized methods, paving the way for new forms of liquidity provision 📚🌉

As DeFi continues to evolve, the balance between accessibility, profitability, and risk management remains a crucial area for development ☯️

The future of DeFi liquidity models will likely continue to be shaped by these competing forces.

In conclusion, the DeFi liquidity landscape is not only about technological innovation but also about strategic evolution 👀

Understanding and adapting to these changes is key for anyone looking to navigate this dynamic and rapidly evolving space.

Curious to learn more?

🏰 READ OUR FULL PUBLICATION BELOW 🏰

https://chronicle.castlecapital.vc/p/evolution-liquidity-provision-deep-dive-defis-architectural-plumbing

Liquidity Gigabrains 🧠 ⬇️
@haydenzadams
@AndreCronjeTech
@newmichwill
@fcmartinelli
@bantg
@cburniske
@levysaur
@Cryptoyieldinfo
@hufhaus9
@0xApolloFi
@Ace_da_Book
@crypto_linn
@ReveloIntel
@lafachief
@leviathan_news
@0xBebis_
@DaoChemist
@DailyGwei_TV
@sassal0x
@defi_mochi


Friends of Castle ⬇️ 🏰
@Defi0xJeff
@DefiIgnas
@crypthoem
@OvrCldJonny
@0xTindorr
@belizardd
@LouisCooper_
@defiprincess_
@milesdeutscher
@0xnocta
@TheDeFISaint
@Hercules_Defi
@TheDeFinvestor
@toffee248
@splinter0n
@arndxt_xo
@Louround_
@rektdiomedes
@jake_pahor
@chilla_ct

More Frens of Castle ⬇️ 🏰
@DAdvisoor
@TheiaResearch
@sendingalpha
@DegenSensei
@0xhuntingalpha
@TaikiMaeda2
@0xKepler
@0xPrismatic
@WinterSoldierxz
@rektdiomedes
@thedailydegenhq
@RiceMaximalist
@Slappjakke
@BillyBobBaghold
@0xSalazar
@thelearningpill
@WinterSoldierxz
@Moomsxxx

🏰 Don't forget to subscribe to receive our weekly newsletter and in-depth research articles  🏰

https://castle-chronicle.beehiiv.com/subscribe

The Evolution of Liquidity Provision in DeFi

🏰 Research Report 🏰

Do grants fuel innovation? ⛽

In Part 2 of the series on @optimismFND RetroPGF, we looked at where the grants ended up and what the recipients were all about.

A story principled by accountability and transparency.


Full Report Linked Below 📚 👇


🏰 CHECK OUT OUR FULL PUBLICATION BELOW 🏰

https://chronicle.castlecapital.vc/p/puzzling-reality-optimism-grants-pt2-good-neutral-questionable

Missed the first part? 💡

We unveiled what all RetroPGF recipients did with their grants - whether they sold, held, or unknown.

Now in Part 2, we evaluate the selected recipients on their contributions and impact on the Optimism ecosystem.  🔎

Part 1: https://chronicle.castlecapital.vc/p/puzzling-reality-optimism-grants-pt-1-introduction-movements

This report is about assessing the contributions of some of the recipients and highlighting the critical need for accountability and transparency in grant usage.

Assessing the effectiveness of crypto grants is crucial, yet it's often been lacking.

So far the RetroPGF has been quite effective and we are happy to see that.

In general, funds went to the right parties and some even made an effort to use funds to further contribute to the Optimism ecosystem! 👏

Find commentary on some of the recipients in our report 👀

With that being said, there is always room for improvement.

Through voting, a lot of funds ended up being given out to less impactful projects. We could do better! Though, it is hard to tie a judgement system to retro-active grants, let alone KPIs, in a decentralized manner.

cc:
@VitalikButerin
@modularmedia_
@DailyGwei_TV
@sassal0x
@optimismFND
@OptimismGrants

@DAdvisoor
@ReveloIntel
@TheiaResearch
@sendingalpha
@DegenSensei
@0xhuntingalpha
@TaikiMaeda2
@0xKepler
@0xPrismatic
@WinterSoldierxz
@rektdiomedes
@thedailydegenhq
@VirtualKenji
@RiceMaximalist
@Slappjakke
@zerokn0wledge_
@erico

The Impact of Grants on Innovation: RetroPGF Report

Calling all $ARB delegates - the Snapshot vote for The Arbitrum Coalition finishes on the 10th of November!

Castle will be voting AGAINST funding the Coalition proposal.

While we recognize the importance to advance research and development initiatives for the DAO, we believe… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1722290843904524524 

Calling all $ARB delegates - the Snapshot vote for ARB Staking finishes tomorrow!

Castle will be voting AGAINST funding this Staking proposal.

While we appreciate innovative efforts to improve the Arbitrum ecosystem, we question the necessity and alignment of such a model with… https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1721158651161760071 

🏰 Modular Series: A Deep Dive on Data Availability 🏰

Ever wondered how we can solve the data availability bottleneck in blockchain tech? You won't believe the solutions that are on the horizon!

Written by our very own @zerokn0wledge_

Full article linked below! 📚👇

Curious to learn more?

🏰 CHECK OUT OUR FULL PUBLICATION BELOW 🏰

https://chronicle.castlecapital.vc/p/deepdive-data-availability

First of all, thanks to @AvailProject for reviewing and sharing data on DA cost with us for this report.

We also want to thank @CelestiaOrg and specifically @likebeckett for review & input on the report!

Let's dive in!

The Data Availability (DA) problem refers to the question of how peers in a blockchain network can be sure that all the data of a newly proposed block is actually available.

DA currently presents the main scalability bottleneck Ethereum-based rollups face.

DA is important to ensure the security and liveness of the system. Primarily because if the data is not available...

...nobody can verify the state of the chain anymore.
...nobody can verify the sequencer doesn't misbehave.
...the rollup can't reconstruct its state.

DA poses limitations to rollups:

⚠️ The number of transactions per second a sequencer can process is limited by the data throughput of the underlying data availability solution.

⚠️ If there is a lot of demand for blockspace on L1, DA gets more expensive for rollups.

Currently, rollups use calldata to post data to Ethereum L1, ensuring both data availability and storage.

Transaction calldata is the hexadecimal data passed along with a transaction that allows us to send messages to other entities or interact with smart contracts.

However, calldata is limited to ~10KB per block & with a fixed price of 16 gas/byte is very expensive.

The limited data space on Ethereum and the high cost of L1 blockspace heavily limit rollup scalability.

To quantify this, call data cost accounts for 90% of rollup tx cost.

Some L2 teams have tried to address this by opting for off-chain data availability solutions or what is called Data Availability Committees (DAC).

These sets of (normally trusted) entities, provide guarantees to make data available as needed while storing it centrally.

Keeping in mind Ethereum's mission-driven vision and the importance of decentralization & end user verifiability in mind though, the issue here becomes clear.

There is once again a significant trade-off between scalability and decentralization/security (blockchain trilemma).

To improve the DA capacity of Ethereum L1 and improve its capabilities to serve as a DA layer for rollups, there are important upgrades on the roadmap:

⚙️ EIP-4844 (a.k.a. Proto-Danksharding)
⚙️ Full Danksharding

EIP-4844 will introduce a novel tx type, commonly referred to as blob-carrying transaction". This will enable a new type of data that rollups can use.

These data blobs will essentially be a one-off increase in blockspace and be space available exclusively to rollups.

This will separate the fee market for rollup data from general execution.

This decoupling means that in the future, rollups won't be negatively impacted by activity spikes on L1.

EIP-4844 is expected to significantly reduce rollup fees in the mid-term.

Long-term, a one-off increase in blockspace won't cut it though.

That is why Ethereum is also working towards the implementation of full Danksharding.

Danksharding is a specific form of data sharding, where validator subsets (shards) provide data space to rollups.

The beauty in this is that each validator subset just provides DA to part of the ecosystem.

So let's assume we have 1000 validators, all storing the same data.

Now we break that down into 10 shards of 10 validators, each shard storing different data.

This results in a 10x increase in the data space available (to rollups).

However, the validators need to be sure that not only the data on their assigned shard is available, but also that data on other shards is available.

This is achieved through a combination of erasure coding & data availability sampling.

We won't elaborate on this here, but check our report for detailed explanations!

So, the future of Ethereum as a major DA layer for rollups seems to look brighter.

Nonetheless, it will take some time until EIP-4844 and especially full danksharding are rolled out and implemented.

This puts alternative DA solutions in an interesting position.

One such solution is @CelestiaOrg

Celestia is a modular DA layer that is specifically focused only on providing cheap blockspace to rollups.

To achieve this, the Celestia network is run by a combination of full nodes and light nodes (where the latter play a key role!).

Celestia relies on light nodes that perform DAS on erasure-coded blocks of data.

Light nodes with DAS superpowers can actively contribute to network security!

By randomly sampling data, light nodes can arrive at probabilistic security guarantees of data being available.

In a system where there is at least one honest full node that can provide fraud proofs in case of invalid state changes, this allows light nodes to operate under the same security guarantees as full nodes.

One great feature of this design is also that with an increasing number of participating light nodes, the block size that can be randomly sampled under sufficiently high security guarantees increases as well.

Celestia scales with the number of light nodes!

Another promising modular DA solution is @AvailProject.

It is very similar to Celestia, as it also is an app-specific L1 that solely focuses on providing cheap DA to rollups.

Instead of the Cosmos SDK stack (like Celestia), Avail is built on the substrate framework though.

Additionally, Avail uses validity proofs (KZG commitments) to ensure light node security.

This means there is no delay until light nodes are sure about the validity of a state change.

However, this comes with additional proof generation overhead on the full node side.

This essentially boils down to a trade-off between cost and latency.

Like Celestia though, Avail uses light nodes that perform DAS on erasure-coded blocks, enabling the network to scale with the number of light nodes.

EigenDA by @eigenlayer is a modular data availability solution that takes a very different approach.

Instead of an app-specific L1 with PoS consensus and consequently crypto-economic security, EigenDA is based on EigenLayer's restaking contracts.

In this setup, restaking Ethereum validators can opt in to secure a DA layer.

The rollup (data buyer or disperser) encodes the transaction data with erasure code and generates a KZG commitment, where proof size depends on the erasure code’s redundancy ratio.

The KZG is committed to the EigenDA smart contracts and the encoded KZG commitment is then distributed to EigenDA nodes by the disperser.

After receiving the KZG commitment, these nodes compare it to the EigenDA smart contract’s KZG commitment and sign the attestation after confirming that it is correct.

After that, the disperser collects these signatures one by one, generates aggregated signatures, and publishes them to the EigenDA smart contract, which verifies the signatures.

Security (that data is available) is ensured through what is referred to as "Proof of Custody".

Anyone can submit a proof (that a validator is lazy) to the EigenDA smart contract, which will be verified by the smart contract.

If the verification is successful, the lazy validator is slashed (as it’s an objectively attributable fault).

In conclusion, DA currently is the main bottleneck rollups face on Ethereum.

Modular DA layers are definitely a game-changer and will enable novel network & app designs.

It also allows for a better performance & UX of use cases that have previously suffered under the limitations of the monolithic L1.

Especially as an intermediary solution pre-EIP4844 & Danksharding, but also as a low cost DA provider for highly cost-sensitive use cases and the long-tail of modular rollups, we expect alternative DA solutions to gain significant adoption.

tagging some modular experts that might be interested in this:
@CelestiaOrg
@AvailProject
@eigenlayer
@VitalikButerin
@modularmedia_
@DailyGwei_TV
@sassal0x
@nickwh8te
@sreeramkannan
@jon_charb
@jadler0
@zkBri
@anuragarjun
@_mayurc
@3EKV_
@divine_economy
@modularmedia_

and our frens you should follow:
@DAdvisoor
@ReveloIntel
@TheiaResearch
@DegenSensei
@0xhuntingalpha
@TaikiMaeda2
@0xKepler
@0xPrismatic
@WinterSoldierxz
@rektdiomedes
@thedailydegenhq
@VirtualKenji
@RiceMaximalist
@CryptoMaestro

and some more chads:
@Louround_
@ayyyeandy
@DeFiMann
@TheDeFISaint
@0xSalazar
@poopmandefi
@ShivanshuMadan
@MTorygreen
@hmalviya9
@DOLAK1NG
@kunalgoel
@Pansophichad
@0xAndrewMoh
@splinter0n
@wacy_time1

And once again, hats off to this piece's author @zerokn0wledge_!