Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn, Threads, & Mastodon at the same time, in one click.
Make it punchier 👊
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion 🙏
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators love Typefully
170,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Köhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
🙈 Distraction-free
✍️ Write-only Twitter
🧵 Effortless threads
📈 Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
We’ve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If you’re still tweeting from Twitter you’re wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully 😍
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Writing prompts & personalized post ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
1️⃣ "IDtech" is overly-broad. It covers what we know as "self-sovereign identity", "SSI", or "Web5"...but it *also* covers traditional selfie-scan-check (e.g., Onfido, Jumio), single sign-on (e.g., Auth0, Okta, Microsoft AD).
The concept of "identity providers" or "identity & access management" is *too* strongly entrenched in the minds of this corner of tech industry as relating to authentication + authorisation.
We need a more *precise* term than IDtech to distinguish it from the broad idea of IAM.
I don't think SSI / Verifiable Credentials *supplants* IAAA (acronym alert! thorteaches.com/cissp-iaaa/), it *augments* it. This from actual conversations with clients/architects over many years where they don't really understand why SSI is powerful, until that distinction is made.
The more I think of it, the more I get to the conclusion that a constellation of different-but-related terms will need to replace "SSI", at least outside of the in-crowd.
E.g., I can totally see "self-custodied" perform with the crypto crowd, because they love their "not your keys, not your crypto" mantra.
Unsure whether "self-managed" has the same ring to it for general audience, especially since it doesn't have widely-known mantra like above.
3️⃣ "Verifiable Credentials" are "verifiable" in exactly one sense: that it's cryptographically untampered since the point it was issued (or tamper evident).
Where this breaks down is when the term "verifiable" is used with legal/compliance audience, especially as it often gets mangled to "VERIFIED credentials".
In *their* context, "verifi..." means "the data contained within can be trusted". Not whether it's untampered (but false).
Which is why @cheqd_io we played around with "trusted" data or "authentic" data to distinguish "verifiable cryptographically as untampered" (since the data itself could still be "false") vs "cryptographically verifiable AND you can trust it".
Tbh, I don't think either of those takes is *quite* there yet. "Trusted" performs slightly better than "authentic", IMO. Like @rileyphughes, the problem is that the usage of these terms in English just varies so much based on context!
And to answer the question "how many terms have you heard 'verified credential' instead of 'verifiable credential'?" Honestly? Too many times than either I or @fraser_again can count, as soon as we step outside SSI. Especially when talking to teams in large enterprises/govt. 🥲
(For context, I've sat on non-technical standards bodes/panels such as Open Identity Exchange, Tech UK, Fintech Panel etc and a lot of bank teams while at R3, and their interpretation of "verified"/"verifiable is completely different, and the mix-up between the two VERY common.)
The reason why, IMO, that distinction between untampered vs data inside can be trusted comes into play is ultimately it's the latter they care about. I also use it as a *reminder* to those teams that assessing verifiable credentials is *exactly* the same as they assess a PDF
...upload, as far as the legal perspective/liability goes. Yes, an SSI VC will speed up some of the steps/checks by rejecting obvious tampering etc but they still need to trust:
a) data in the credential
b) the issuer
...which is where we run into *trust* registries 🤔
...rules that apply, but rather it's the *portability* that's the key characteristic.
E.g.: I've seen in past few weeks, as people are moving Twitter -> Mastodon, that unscrupulous actors are replicating entire Twitter profiles (with posts) on a different Mastodon server
Having said that..."trusted"/"trustable" over-indexes for the definition of those two terms as defined in traditional KYC/ID verification processes.
But there are other use cases, e.g., porting a social media profile from Twitter to Mastodon, where it's not traditional "trust"
Also, a lot of *technical* engineers/architects, especially if they have any IAM background at all, in my experience find it hard to distinguish "verifiable" (checking the envelope) vs "checking what's inside the envelope". Traditional IAM often cares only about the former.
...than the one the original author created. VCs can enable a form of portability, Obviously, there's no legal/regulatory body that can define a "trust registry" for Twitter (unless they get into this game themselves - and why would they?!)
I'm unsure how to frame that example ("this is THE correct Mastodon profile for THIS Twitter user), which I do think VCs will play a role in.
Outside of a regulated industry, what's the term that will land? Is it verified? Trusted/trustable? Portable? (Likely a blend.)
Thanks for this enlightening read @rileyphughes (and other contributors on that blog post) - definitely very thought-provoking! 🤗 (And sorry for reply-spamming - will post it as a Medium comment too later, but I find conversations are much better on Twitter.)