Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn & Mastodon too. More platforms coming soon.
Make it punchier š
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it š„
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion š
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators loveĀ Typefully
150,000+ creators andĀ teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Kƶhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
š Distraction-free
āļø Write-only Twitter
š§µ Effortless threads
š Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
Weāve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If youāre still tweeting from Twitter youāre wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully š
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor ā unique and super useful š
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content inĀ seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - withĀ noĀ need forĀ extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics thatĀ matter
Build your audience with insights that makeĀ sense.
Writing prompts & personalized postĀ ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweetsĀ together
Write and publish with your teammates andĀ friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it š„
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
š week 5 of @ycombinator's @startupschool kicked off today
new format today: a live discussion between @mwseibel & @daltonc
š§ Recognizing and Avoiding Tarpit Ideas
š sharing my notes:
in the first startup school talk, we discussed tarpit ideas
this talk will go deeper into the topic and how to get out of these tarpit ideas
it's the first time they're doing it live - usually they have time to edit!
today they're giving advice on the startup ideas that founders most often pivot into and out of
they are TARPIT ideas!
michael did some research on a (non startup) tarpit:
a place on the earth where tar and petroleum is seeping up from the ground - forming a tarpit
to animals, it resembles a freshwater pond - so they go in and get stuck
their screams attract other animals, who also get stuck
everyone dies ā ļøā ļøā ļø
you'll find many fossilized remains of startups in the startup version of tarpits
just don't go in!!
consumer internet startup ideas - they start here because the most common ideas on YC applications are consumer
most tarpit ideas are in consumer
most ideas that they reject are in consumer
what is a consumer business?
simple definition: free or paid service and random people will consume it. not businesses but individual
e.g. @netflix, @facebook / @Meta
if there are hundreds of millions of potential customers, then you're probably in a consumer business
why do founders tend to choose consumer ideas?
because they are consumers. we all have opinions about how goods and services that we consume can be better
for people not in tech, when you think of startups, every startup you can think of is typically a consumer idea
here's the issue - for most pre product market fit companies that they see at YC,
the founders are miles away from something working
they're not calibrated on what a good consumer idea is
or what success looks like
they'll mistake a few early users as successful traction
for example @reddit has been around for nearly 15 years. when you at how it started small and grew and grew - now 10s of millions of people use it everyday
for the longest time, when it was small, no one cared
people only cared much later when it was huge
consumer founders want money up front to drive huge growth - but the reddit story was of an under-capitalized company that grew slowly
reddit spend zero on user acquisition, it grew organically burning basically zero money
@mwseiebel is on the board of @reddit so he knows what he's talking about!
it's still early in the @reddit monetization strategy - which is crazy given that it's 17 years old!
another example - @twitch
interesting case because within 2 years, they got to 30m monthly active users, approx $8m annual revenue. they got a $24m valuation. they spent zero on user acquisition. all their time was focused on making streaming cheaper so they wouldn't die
they only survived by finding a way to make their streaming 10x cheaper than competitors
investors didn't believe that they could monetize via video ads. so they had to wait for that entire market to form
the calibration here: there was infinite demand for these products and user acquisition wasn't the issue
both products got millions of users for free but they were still nearly dead
if you don't have millions of users then it's definitely not a good sign
looking at @google now - they crawl the web, they don't pay anyone for that. they pay for servers. people go to google .com voluntarily and use it 20-30 times a day. each search is worth money. costs basically nothing
they get $500m a day from users to run the website. that's a great consumer business. they could fire everyone and continue to make that money
@google spent literally zero on user acquisition. they built something amazing that everyone wanted
the MVP was hosted on a stanford university website and people found it organically
that's the benchmark
@facebook also a great business
their retention and sign up numbers:
75% of their harvard users signed up within 48 hours. they used it for 2 hours a day. that was pre-funding, when it was mark in a dorm room
zero on CAC. zero on engineering hires. zero money raised
the same thing happened at yale and other early schools
all pre-funding
that is the bar - if you build a new social network and you can do that, then maybe they will notice
the message - if you're doing a consumer idea, don't lie about what business you're in and the (very high) bar for success
there aren't many facebook type businesses left to build because there is a cap on the number of hours someone can spend on social media
the current stats suggest that people are already on social media for nearly as long as people are awake
so it's totally zero sum. you will compete against giants like facebook and tiktok
there are consumer services like @airbnb and @uber - where you increase the market with superior services
there is a play there but you can't ignore the scale element
you need MASSIVE scale for these things to work
people often ignore tech adoption cycles, where a new platform comes in and there is a race for that platform
e.g. with @apple's iphone, now who will take advantage of that
without new platforms coming out, the incumbents get really powerful
consider if you're in the start or end of one of these cycles
front running the cycle is almost never worth it
e.g. VR 5 years ago
a lot of ideas are now about adding tokens or decentralization
that might work but don't lie to yourself that there isn't a new problem: incentive structure is different
if the value of the token doesn't go up then people get mad
you will have tens of thousands of anonymous strangers criticizing you - a lot of people who take this path end up quitting
michael compares it to going public before launching - sounds very stressful to have all these shareholders watching your business
you have to do something more than just add a token
it's a bit like adding 'social features' to random products in a previous tech cycle
what is a tarpit idea?
ground rules: these are not ideas that can NEVER work or that they would never fund them at YC
they fund tarpit ideas all the time
BUT the founders who make it work are deep experts, are aware of that risk, that many people have failed and understand the problem
that all helps them execute better
during a YC interview, they will know who has failed and why they will do it differently. they'll leave a 10 minute interview learning something new from these founders
another note: the reason these are tarpits is because something is appealing or sexy. people may give positive feedback about it
the worst tarpits make founders emotionally attached and super defensive about criticism about the idea
that's why they will see the same ideas over and over again - even across 7 years
it's a bit weird
a non tarpit idea - which is comically bad - a personal air balloon for commuting. it's just obviously wrong
consumer businesses have a higher chance of being tarpit ideas than non consumer businesses
it's hard to have expertise in non consumer businesses. a larger group can fall into the consumer traps
it's compounded by people sharing these consumer ideas with other non tech startup friends
faux world of startups like Shark Tank contributes to this
if you believe that world then you'll fall for things like consumer packaged goods
they are targeting views for their show and it's not related to actual big successful businesses
you have to put things into the context of the time you're in
some ideas that worked in the past:
TV channel for people who like music (MTV)
news channel that plays 24 hours a day (CNN)
these days there are not as many ideas for new TV channels
you'll see low hanging fruit get taken and the bar gets higher and higher with time
here are some tarpit ideas
1 - the app to discover new things to do: events, concerts, etc
everyone wants to believe there is something great out there and they could learn more about it
"discovery is broken"
Michael realizes that that mythical restaurant doesn't exist out there
no amount of discouragement will stop founders
Dalton thinks it's a phase that founders just have to go through
so many good people waste years of their lives on this
psychologically, humans are susceptible to FOMO and this hits on the human fear
2 - something to do with creators
a lot of people on social media are exposed to creators because they are celebrities
you come up with tons of ideas around helping them connect, monetize, etc
because it's available
why don't these work?
creators are proto-celebrities. they are on the path to becoming celebrities
why don't billion dollar companies exist to serve A list celebrities?
because those users can consume very tailor-made solutions that are perfectly calibrated to them
it's also very hard to separate the creator from the platform
as the platforms change then they may not keep up
just like the celebrity who can't control which movie they are casted in
very tricky group of people to build for
because this is a tarpit, people are really defensive about this space
it makes them irrationally hold on to the idea
3rd tarpit idea - something to help brands
michael's best guess on why these all fail:
trying to sell software to people who don't value software
people love luxury brands but they don't value software
4th tarpit idea - anything about ads
problem: the platforms where ads run control the ecosystem
it's very scary because you can get revenue, so you can think it's working
but watch out. massive platform risk
when you need them and they don't need you, it's very problematic
5th tarpit idea - consumer packaged goods & consumer hardware
the reality is that these businesses do free R&D for large brands
producing physical products at scale is extremely hard and extremely expensive
they have shitty cashflow dynamics
huge upfront R&D and product costs, which is better for large companies
they typically sell to big brands like @Nest selling to @Google
it's tricky because there is a real demand from consumers
but you cannot fulfill that demand at scale
6th tarpit idea - crowdfunding
it's been popular since 2008 so it's hard to find more crowdfunding niches
very low success rate
crowdfunding betrays the problem because money is only one of many inputs for success
7th tarpit idea - gambling software
people LOVE this idea because they gamble
Michael's explanation is: sharks vs newbs. Sharks prey on newbs. Newbs don't want that. Sharks will always find more newbs. News will run away when faced by sharks. You can't balance these two
8th - options/crypto trading
again people love this personally but it doesn't necessarily mean that it's a good idea
a lot of people get caught in it
9th tarpit idea - vague web3 startup idea with tokens etc
when you dig in, it's basically just tokens attached to some physical thing like real estate
@opensea wasn't theoretical, they had customers and revenue. not just adding tokens
Michael didn't think opensea was a good idea but he could use it. and there were people using it that loved it
it's hard to get honest feedback in web3 because people can make money off speculating on it
the feedback loop is broken in web3
10th tarpit idea - another social network
people are VERY defensive about these ideas
they really believe they can make it
Michael's advice is do it - don't pitch when it's not yet launched
non consumer ideas:
there are less tarpit ideas in non consumer land
because many just got stuck and die in consumer land
this topic will become a part 2 because we've run out of time...
Q&A with @KatManalac
cliche college student ideas?
Dalton says just experiment on fun ideas in college. Have fun. Don't worry too much about VC funding.
Michael sees many people trying to be at the next stage instead of enjoying the college experience
when should I pivot if I'm in a tarpit idea?
if you can launch fast and fail fast - do that
the problem with tarpit ideas is that you can get stuck in ideation phase for months