Get fresh prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
The best writing experience, with powerful scheduling
Create your content without distractions - where it's easier to write and organize threads.
Cross-post to LinkedIn
NEW
Automatically add LinkedIn versions to your posts.
+14
Followers
Discover what works with powerful analytics
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
@frankdilo
Feedback?
@albigiu
Love it 🔥
Collaborate on drafts and leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
🧵
Rewrite as thread start
🔥
Make it Punchier
✅
Fix Grammar
Improve your content with AI suggestions and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Tweets
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Top tweeters love Typefully
100,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence. Join them.
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
I forgot about Twitter for 10 years. Now I'm remembering why I liked it in the first place.
Huge part of my new love for it: @typefully. It makes writing threads easy and oddly fun.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully.
ian hollander@ianhollander
Such a huge fan of what @typefully has brought to the writing + publishing experience for Twitter.
Easy, elegant and almost effortless threads - and a beautiful UX that feels intuitive for the task - and inviting to use.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Kudos to @frankdilo and @linuz90 for building such a delightful experience.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your tweet with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each tweet to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your tweets for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Tweet with daily inspiration
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Start with a fresh idea
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Check examples out
Get inspiration from tweets that used these prompts and ideas.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
@frankdilo
Feedback?
@albigiu
Love it 🔥
Add comments
NEW
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
There are a variety of discrimination and bias issues in the public sector’s innovation funding ecosystem. Some of these issues are the product of decades of systemic bias including racism, while others have developed over time through bureaucratic bloat and other shortcomings.
No matter the provenence, the effect is the same: innovation is stagnating as more and more grants are delivered to older, white men while diverse groups, younger scientists, and riskier, high-impact ideas are shut out from the process.
A glaring example of this issue can be found by looking at the research project grants from the National Institute of Health. The Research Project Grant (R01) provides support for health-related research and development.
It’s awarded to a specified project to be performed by the awarded investigator or researcher. In 2018, nearly 94% of R01 grants were awarded to White/Asian applicants, while 2% were awarded to Black/African American applicants and 4% to Hispanic/LatinX applicants.
Diversity has an important and often overlooked psychological role in innovation. In an article published for Scientific American, Professor Katherine Phillips described the following:
“Members of a homogeneous group rest somewhat assured that they will agree with one another; that they will understand one another's perspectives and beliefs; that they will be able to easily come to a consensus.
But when members of a group notice that they are socially different from one another, they change their expectations. They anticipate differences of opinion and perspective. They assume they will need to work harder to come to a consensus.
This logic helps to explain both the upside and the downside of social diversity: people work harder in diverse environments both cognitively and socially. They might not like it, but the hard work can lead to better outcomes.”
Currently, public innovation funding does not curate or encourage diverse teams to come to the table. If this ecosystem is going to thrive, if we are going to address the challenges that face our world, we need programs that encourage and invite diverse teams of innovators.