Built for ๐, LinkedIn, and Threads, powered by AI
Write & schedule, effortlessly
Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn, Threads, & Mastodon at the same time, in one click.
Make it punchier ๐
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it ๐ฅ
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion ๐
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators loveย Typefully
180,000+ creators andย teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Kรถhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
๐ Distraction-free
โ๏ธ Write-only Twitter
๐งต Effortless threads
๐ Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
Weโve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If youโre still tweeting from Twitter youโre wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully ๐
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
Luca Rossi ๊ฉ@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor โ unique and super useful ๐
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content inย seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - withย noย need forย extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics thatย matter
Build your audience with insights that makeย sense.
Writing prompts & personalized postย ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweetsย together
Write and publish with your teammates andย friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it ๐ฅ
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
Towards the end of my talk about the new #reactnative arch and how to migrate to it, I share this (fairly massive) graph ๐ผ๐
I made this flowchart in an attempt to help teams in the early days of defining their migration plan; let me walk you through some of the main points ๐งต
Step 0: this graphs assumes that you are on latest of RN (w/e is available at the time of you using it)
(personally, it looks like 0.70 is shaping up to be the better "base version" to attempt this climb)
Then, it makes you focus on libraries first: there's no way around it...
...we all need to collaborate and migrate the libraries we use. Send PRs!
I put using react-native-test-app because that madlad of @lord_sherlock has basically introduced in it Fabric & TM switches already: so you can easily test in isolation the library, in a painless way.
In the same vein, that's why I then suggest that if you have custom native code lying around in your app, you migrate it into its own lib and then apply the same approach as per the libs (migrating & use RNTA)
Going for "dividi-et-impera" is the less painful approach IMHO.
Next step is to start working to enable TurboModules in app. Thankfully, enabling TM and Fabric are two separate and indipendent processes, so you focus on just one without forcing yourself to also do the other.
The reason why TM first is simple: backward compability.
Basically, you can turn on TM, and libraries that have not migrated yet will still work. (this is something that will get switched off at a later stage, which is why we still need to migrate as many libs as possible!)
And once that's done, you can then focus on Fabric.
Fabric doesn't have backward compability and when you turn it on, it brings along all the magic mystical stuff from React 18 โ๏ธ - so basically this step is a big jump and you need all the libs to support it for your app to work correctly.
And that's it!
Once the talk is uploaded somewhere I'll share it so that you can hear in more details my reasonings around it - but I hope that this thread was a decent enough overview of my thinking.
What do you think? How would you change this?
For further context, I've discussed this internally at MSFT and with Meta engineers, so it's something that went through some reviews already :)