Like it or not (I don't..), but mass-scale clinical testing for COVID-19 is likely going away in the near future.
Just as we're entering a new wave π.
A 𧡠on priority areas I think we *must* focus on:
1οΈβ£ Wastewater surveillance
2οΈβ£ Clinical sequencing
3οΈβ£ Home testing
Since testing will get more biased and reporting may likely (mostly) disappear, we're left in the blind on the rise of future waves - until they hit hospitals π π.
Now, we should solve this by *not* decreasing testing, but that's unlikely to happen.
Enter,
1οΈβ£ Wastewater surveillance
To make up for the lack in testing, we need to heavily invest in wastewater surveillance - measure the amount of SARS-CoV-2 in communal wastewater - across the country. The WHOLE country.
Test and report daily. "Daily" means "every day" btw...
Via our SEARCH Alliance here in San Diego, we're already doing this. But these programs need sustainable funding - which isn't currently the case. We practically have to beg for money on a daily basis - and we're not always successful, leading to delays.
searchcovid.info/dashboards/wastewater-surveillance/
Importantly, this surveillance *must* be combined with sequencing of the wastewater - combined with tools such as "Freyja" that @josh__levy developed in our lab.
This allows us to monitor the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 variants in wastewater over time. E.g., π
Note, the frequency and speed at which we see lineage displacement = π€―. We have never observed this with other viruses - so it's key we keep a close eye on SARS-CoV-2 dynamics. This is *not* a process that will magically stop.
Paper on how we do π
medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.21.21268143v1
2οΈβ£ Clinical sequencing
Widescale testing will decrease significantly, which will greatly limit our ability to do non-wastewater based "genomic surveillance" of SARS-CoV-2.
E.g., what SEARCH is currently doing:
searchcovid.info/dashboards/sequencing-statistics/
However, testing of hospitalized COVID-19 patients will presumable continue and it's important to sequence those - and do so consistently.
Why? So we can (a) compare to our wastewater-based sequencing, and (b) if deviations are seen, understand reasons why.
Why might we see deviations? E.g., age-skews in cases, potential differences in variant virulence, etc.
As above, these programs need sustainable support. Do we really need to beg for money for these programs?
SEARCH has been doing genomic surveillance since February, 2020.
3οΈβ£ Home testing
Finally, we really need to get fully behind testing at home. It simply doesn't make any sense to either (a) go queue forever to get a test - with a result reported days later, or (b) not get a test because they're no longer offered.
This model NEVER made sense.
These tests need to be:
1οΈβ£ Widely available
2οΈβ£ Cheap, for those who can afford them and free for those who can't
3οΈβ£ Ideally, (anonymous) reporting of test results should be included via an app
4οΈβ£ Positive results should be combined with accessible/affordable treatment options
SARS-CoV-2 will not magically go away because we wish it so - it's "endemic delusion".
Things will get better, but only if we make it so. Wishing away a virus will achieve the opposite - we have more than two years of data and an estimated ~20m dead to underscore that point.
Finally, I want to thank CDC, NIH, and Conrad Prebys foundation for having supported our work so far.
I'm glad to see the CDC is planning on establishing "Pathogen Genomics Centers of Excellence", which I hope can lead to more sustainable πΊπΈ programs.
cdc.gov/amd/whats-new/pgcoe-nofo.html