Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn & Mastodon too. More platforms coming soon.
Make it punchier 👊
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion 🙏
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators love Typefully
150,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Köhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
🙈 Distraction-free
✍️ Write-only Twitter
🧵 Effortless threads
📈 Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
We’ve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If you’re still tweeting from Twitter you’re wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully 😍
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Writing prompts & personalized post ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
Crowdstrike and SentinelOne used to be serial competitors.
However, I'd argue that this macro env. has further drifted them apart.
Below are some quick notes from their recent earnings, but I want to go into more depth on the factors leading to this divergence in this thread:
$CRWD and $S were founded 2-yrs apart.
Today, $CRWD generates $3.3B growing 35% YoY meanwhile, $S generates $600M and is estimated to grow 41%.
Why this divergence despite only 14-months apart?
My thesis is built around $CRWD's early decision to invest in its managed service.
When $CRWD was founded in 2011, they brought their cloud-based Falcon EDR to market quickly and complemented it w/ human-driven managed services.
$S decided to delay the launch of their product into the market until about late 2015/16 and also refused to add managed service.
Adding a managed service was key at this time bcos when $CRWD launched their EDR in 2012 many SOC analysts in enterprises didn't knw how to manage cloud EDR.
$CRWD analysts were always at hand to offer support in analyzing the telemetry their device generated. $S never got this.
To explain a managed service (MDR vs MSSP)
MSSP is where you pay $CRWD to watch your data & let you know if they see anything that should be flagged.
MDR is alternatively where you can pay for them to just take over all your IT stack and say, "If you see something, fix it."
Now, this mgd service has been key in helping $CRWD stimulate growth in other areas of the business.
As $CRWD has added 25+ product modules, this human element has helped them build trust, allowing to upsell more modules.
It's become so good, $CRWD report cust w/ 7+ modules.
Although $S now has a managed service, from its early days, it always believed that AI could take this role of MDR. They never emphasized building out this arm as much as $CRWD.
This is why they dubbed their flagship product as "autonomous AI", but this strategy hasn't worked.
In cybersecurity, compared to other tech sectors, companies rely on MDR/MSSP recommendations before buying products.
$CRWD's recent leadership in MDR makes them an ideal candidate for SMBs who don't have the budget to staff a full security team in this macro environment.
Channel ecosystem of MDRs, MSSPs, VARs etc who recommend products to clients get to buy the product from $CRWD at a discount, then re-sell to their clients & make money on added services.
As a result, they're incentivized to recc./sell Gartner's leading products that are popular
The dynamic currently at work:
1. $CRWD is the leader on Gartner
2. $CRWD has a strong managed service and partnerships to support customers (SMB & Ent)
3. Full breadth of product modules for customers to consolidate on
This makes it easier for MSSP/VARs to pitch CRWD over $S
This is translating to issues especially in this current environment.
For example, $S saw a 'pronounced' Q1 than did $CRWD.
However, $CRWD closed more deals and is confident about the back half of the year.
These are stack differences for similar competitors.
Also, GTM & Talent issues are beginning is show up.
The CEO talked abt the challenges of closing deals on the call.
$S lost two key talents *within SALES. * Dan was CMO and held many of the keys to $S MSSPs. He led channel partnerships and business dev roles at several SaaS Cos
In my opinion, this small but important decision is leading to the divergence between these two companies.
Many of these are manifested on this list below:
In summary, $CRWD early decision to invest in managed services complemented w/ human analysts has led to advantages that are currently benefitting them in this macro env that demands consolidation.
$S' lack of investing here has further drifted them away from $CRWD in many ways.
There are other structural differences btw $CRWD vs $S versus the likes of $MSFT, $PANW that cut across the endpoint industry.
We'll be diving into these differences and dynamics next week w/ myself and some security leaders.
2-days left, sign-up below.
maven.com/saas101live/saasbootcamp