There is a problem with the Concentrated Liquidity space that we need to talk about.
First the good. We have tools available and being developed by:
- @ApyVision
- @DefiLab_xyz
- @revertfinance
- @BuildrMetrics
- @ApertureFinance
- @uniswapdotfish
These tools allow liquidity managers the flexibility to structure and manage their concentrated liquidity pools!
Trust me.....you do NOT want to do this manually! I've been there, and it's hair-rippingly aggravating.
Imagine tailoring your own custom suit from scratch??
These tools allow us to create our own strategies....our own tailored suits if you will.
Confused on the comparison? Check out my YouTube video on this exact topic in where I explain how a trading strategy is like a tailored suit. Fit to order.
The bad? Current automated liquidity management platforms.
We are being herded into wearing a "tailored suit" that does NOT fit EVERY one of us. Off the RACK! Uggh!
We NEED options. Options to CUSTOMIZE our own strategies....create our own TAILORED SUIT!
We need automation of mundane and difficult (to the avg user) tasks to achieve this! Calling @ArrakisFinance and @GammaStrategies and the like.
We need complete control of rebalance/reranges. LP managers need to control IL that is fit for THEM!
We have LP managers on @Uniswap V3 that farm narrow ranges, some farm tight ranges, some are super active, some are passive, some like to hedge, some don't.....
Each one of these LP managers need a different fitted suit!
They have the capability. But I strongly feel the focus of these automated platforms is on creating a strategy as opposed to providing a platform that can automate tasks to achieve trade ideas for EACH individual.
@ApertureFinance has the right idea - their tool is in beta
Am I the ONLY person with this complaint? I find this hard to believe.
LP managers need proper tools. We need customization. We need a tailored suit. Not a suit off the rack. 🙂
You can read the unrolled version of this thread here: typefully.com/FLOAT_LOCKER/Rn8F8a5