Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn & Mastodon too. More platforms coming soon.
Make it punchier 👊
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion 🙏
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators love Typefully
150,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Köhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
🙈 Distraction-free
✍️ Write-only Twitter
🧵 Effortless threads
📈 Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
We’ve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If you’re still tweeting from Twitter you’re wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully 😍
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Writing prompts & personalized post ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
There was a discussion this morning about the pros/cons of using @obsdmd themes that make frequent breaking changes. I'm considered a power-user of Sanctum, which "moves fast and breaks things," and I wanted to take a moment & share why to me that's a feature, not a drawback.
Obsidian core is very stable.
But, personally, I expect to spend a couple of minutes every day working around something that doesn't quite work the way I expected it to. I beta test a lot of things for people. Bug-hunting is like a video game to me.
eleanorkonik.com/obsidian-replaced-games-now-prolific/
I don't have as many active plugins as someone like @brimwats but I do have 48 plugins installed, and I know full well and good they have bugs, because all software has bugs but complex hobby software provided for free by one developer is statistically more likely to have bugs.
Sometimes Fantasy Calendar's date doesn't iterate correctly, despite the dev's best efforts — and I'm definitely using Fantasy Calendar for things it wasn't intended for. The Pandoc plugin breaks if I have any spaces in my file path, which took me awhile to figure out.
The Primary theme is beautiful but doesn't have support yet for data-task attributes, which I use extensively in my notes — because I am an early adopter. Sometimes, part of being an early adopter is sacrificing backwards compatibility.
And sometimes being an early adopter means taking risks.
As an @obsdmd moderator, when I have time, I test alpha builds so that Insiders are more likely to have a positive beta testing experience.
This occasionally blows up in my face and costs me time, but I don't mind.
Earlier this week, I performed an incredibly dangerous sync maneuver that corrupted my own vault — to see what would happen and have a better report for Licat. I had backups in triplicate, but the point here is that I am willing to do risky things & then take the time to fix it.
I don't use Sanctum because I expect it to be relaxing in the sense that it's "stable," I use Sanctum because it is relaxing in the sense that I don't have to fix my own problems — the developer is responsive, which means iterating quickly, and sometimes that breaks things.
There is serenity in knowing that your feedback will be listened to. It's not really the features that have me all-in on @readwiseio — it's that @deadly_onion responds to every single piece of feedback I give him about the Reader app.
He doesn't always agree, but he listens :P
I know a lot of people really want access to Reader, because Reader is great. But one of the reasons it's still in a closed beta is because they are iterating fast and breaking things in some moderately disruptive ways still.
For people who depend on their software to "just work," breaking changes are catastrophically disruptive.
I am weird in that I get an incredible sense of relaxation from using software where the dev will listen to me, because it means I rarely have to learn to fix it myself.
I'm comfortable waiting and working around broken things because I would rather sit in a kitchen and work while contractors are building out custom cabinets than be stuck in a quiet kitchen where the cabinet doors are broken & I do not have time to fix them — THAT is stressful.
PS: My cousin came over & fixed my cabinet doors last week. He crossed a ton of really dumb little things off my to-do list & I almost wept with gratitude. The fact that I am physically capable of spackling screwholes and adding silicon caulk to a pipe fitting is not the point.
In some ways, what software to use is a question of what you find relaxing and enjoyable. I would rather use Obsidian than more "stable" software that I can't trust to get fixed, but that's not a choice everyone makes.
Enterprise uses OneNote for a reason, yanno? Sanctum let me deprecate my theme, Palatinate, because its dev was the fist person to implement all the features I care about. That's priceless to me.
If sometimes I have to be like "heyyyyy I needed that" when there's a feature update I wasn't expecting, or I need to swap in my own preferred fonts because I have a slightly different aesthetic preference — that's still better than having to update Palatinate for Live Preview.
The tl;dr here is that I will always use occasionally janky software with a response dev I like over stable software that doesn't do literally everything I could ever want, that's like, who I am as a person.
It's foundational to why I use @obsdmd instead of MediaWiki.