Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn, Threads, & Mastodon at the same time, in one click.
Make it punchier 👊
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion 🙏
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators love Typefully
180,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Köhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
🙈 Distraction-free
✍️ Write-only Twitter
🧵 Effortless threads
📈 Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
We’ve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If you’re still tweeting from Twitter you’re wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully 😍
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Writing prompts & personalized post ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
How does a Large Language Model like ChatGPT actually work?
Well, they are both amazingly simple and exceedingly complex at the same time.
Hold on to your butts, this is a deep dive ↓
You can think of a model as calculating the probabilities of an output based on some input.
In language models, this means that given a sequences of words they calculate the probabilities for the next word in the sequence.
Like a fancy autocomplete.
To understand where these probabilities come from, we need to talk about something called a neural network.
This is a network like structure where numbers are fed into one side and probabilities are spat out the other.
They are simpler than you might think.
Imagine we wanted to train a computer to solve the simple problem of recognising symbols on a 3x3 pixel display.
We would need a neural net like this:
- an input layer
- two hidden layers
- an output layer
Our input layer consists of 9 nodes called neurons - one for each pixel. Each neuron would hold a number from 1 (white) to -1 (black).
Our output layer consists of 4 neurons, one for each of the possible symbols. Their value will eventually be a probability between 0 and 1.
In between these, we have rows of neurons, called "hidden" layers. For our simple use case we only need two.
Each neuron is connected to the neurons in the adjacent layers by a weight, which can have a value between -1 and 1.
When a value is passed from the input neuron to the next layer its multiplied by the weight.
That neuron then simply adds up all the values it receives, squashes the value between -1 and 1 and passes it to each neuron in the next layer.
The neuron in the final hidden layer does the same but squashes the value between 0 and 1 and passes that to the output layer.
Each neuron in the output layer then holds a probability and the highest number is the most probable result.
When we train this network, we feed it an image we know the answer to and calculate the difference between the answer and the probability the net calculated.
We then adjust the weights to get closer to the expected result.
But how do we know *how* to adjust the weights?
I won't go into detail, but we use clever mathematical techniques called gradient descent and back propagation to figure out what value for each weight will give us the lowest error.
We keep repeating this process until we are satisfied with the model's accuracy.
This is called a feed forward neural net - but this simple structure won't be enough to tackle the problem of natural language processing.
Instead LLMs tend to use a structure called a transformer and it has some key concepts that unlock a lot of potential.
First, lets talk about words.
Instead of each word being an input, we can break words down into tokens which can be words, subwords, characters or symbols.
Notice how they even include the space.
Much like in our model we represent the pixel value as a number between 0 and 1, these tokens also need to be represented as a number.
We could just give each token a unique number and call it a day but there's another way we can represent them that adds more context.
We can store each token in a multi-dimensional vector that indicates it's relationship to other tokens.
For simplicity, imagine a 2D plane on which we plot the location of words. We want words with similar meanings to be grouped closer together.
This is called an embedding.
Embeddings help create relationships between similar words but they also capture analogies.
For example the distance between the words dog and puppy should be the same as the distance between cat and kitten.
We can also create embeddings for whole sentences.
The first part of the transformer is to encode our input words into these embeddings.
Those embeddings are then fed to the next process, called attention which adds even more context to embeddings.
Attention is massively important in natural language processing.
Embeddings struggle to capture words with multiple meanings.
Consider the two meanings of 'bank'. Humans derive the correct meaning based on the context of the sentence.
'Money' and 'River' are contextually important to the word bank in each of these sentences.
The process of attention looks back through the sentence for words that provide context to the word bank.
It then re-weights the embedding so that the word bank is semantically closer to the word 'river' or 'money'.
This attention process happens many times over to capture the context of the sentence in multiple dimensions.
After all this, the contextualised embeddings are eventually passed into a neural net, like our simple one from earlier, that produces probabilities.
That is a massively simplified version of how an LLM like ChatGPT actually works. There is so much I've left out or skimmed over for the sake of brevity (this is the 20th tweet).
If I left something important out or got some detail wrong, let me know.