I looked back at some of the pieces I worked on while @CellRepMed. Certain ones resonated with me, so I put together a little collection in chronological order. There’s a lot of #dei in here and interesting voices too. Enjoy! 🧵
“Advancing the inclusion of underrepresented women in clinical research”
“women remain underrepresented in, and underserved by, clinical trials…and that underrepresentation is significantly more acute for women of color.”
cell.com/cell-reports-medicine/fulltext/S2666-3791(22)00059-3
“These proposed bills and laws share common flaws—they are based on false claims about standards of care and health outcomes for people with gender dysphoria, and they are based on inaccurate, biased, and misleading representations of the evidence base.”
And they represent politically and ideologically motivated intrusions into the practice of medicine. I’ve tweeted a lot about this here — legislators, courts and ideologues shouldn’t shape standards of care.
A journal’s voice is the product of its authors’ voices. In this way, I think of editors sort of as conductors. There are times, however, when a journal must speak directly. This was one of them.
I still cannot fathom that in the span of one day, the highest US court, whose motto is “equal justice under the law,” jeopardized the health of countless Americans by increasing the rights of gun owners and then removed the right to essential reproductive healthcare. 💔
This mini-collection represents work I’m really proud to have been able to work on. Thank you to all the authors tagged and I tagged here for affording me the privilege to work with them!