1/ There are many 'well-acronymed' frameworks for how we interact with TfTs/note-taking systems.
Ultimately the activities boil down to one of four things:
Input, Retrieval, Organising, or Output
Reducing the latency between these activities is crucial for unlocking digital joy
2/ How do these four areas apply to writing and task management?
Input: Capturing or creating
Retrieval: Searching or organic re-rediscovery
Organising: Structuring, managing, editing or processing
Output: Publishing or completing
3/ One oversight is that they are usually expressed linearly, whereas the interplay tends to be non-linear.
Writing on a particular topic? Pull-up reference notes/prompting questions. See something out of place? Re-arrange it. Remember some task/todo? Quickly jot it down.
4/ This is not an endorsement of multi-tasking: I'm all for separating 'maker' vs 'manager' time & reducing context switching.
However, applied thinking is dynamic & cannot be reduced to 2-dimensions. Reducing the friction between the different activities is instead necessary.
5/ Organisation is often the chief stumbling block for input and retrieval: "where do I put this?" and "where do I find that again?"
Networked outliners like @Logseq and @RoamResearch (& sort of @obsdmd with plugins🤔) allow us to side-step the upfront organisational burden.
6/ How do they do it?
- Daily journal page for frictionless input (that can be organised later)
- Organisation through indenting and backlinks (even in the middle of a brain dump!)
- Referencing at both the block and page-level.
- Multiple areas to retrieve your notes.
7/ I'm all for left to right frameworks (particularly diagrams!), but finding the flow between these activities has been transformative for me, so much so that I think I'm going to come up with my own acronym. Let's give it a go:
IROrIOuRIOuROrOuIROuIOr
Darn it, butchered it 🙈