Craft and publish engaging content in an app built for creators.
NEW
Publish anywhere
Post on LinkedIn & Mastodon too. More platforms coming soon.
Make it punchier 👊
Typefully
@typefully
We're launching a Command Bar today with great commands and features.
AI ideas and rewrites
Get suggestions, tweet ideas, and rewrites powered by AI.
Turn your tweets & threads into a social blog
Give your content new life with our beautiful, sharable pages. Make it go viral on other platforms too.
+14
Followers
Powerful analytics to grow faster
Easily track your engagement analytics to improve your content and grow faster.
Build in public
Share a recent learning with your followers.
Create engagement
Pose a thought-provoking question.
Never run out of ideas
Get prompts and ideas whenever you write - with examples of popular tweets.
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Share drafts & leave comments
Write with your teammates and get feedback with comments.
NEW
Easlo
@heyeaslo
Reply with "Notion" to get early access to my new template.
Jaga
@kandros5591
Notion 🙏
DM Sent
Create giveaways with Auto-DMs
Send DMs automatically based on engagement with your tweets.
And much more:
Auto-Split Text in Posts
Thread Finisher
Tweet Numbering
Pin Drafts
Connect Multiple Accounts
Automatic Backups
Dark Mode
Keyboard Shortcuts
Creators love Typefully
150,000+ creators and teams chose Typefully to curate their Twitter presence.
Marc Köhlbrugge@marckohlbrugge
Tweeting more with @typefully these days.
🙈 Distraction-free
✍️ Write-only Twitter
🧵 Effortless threads
📈 Actionable metrics
I recommend giving it a shot.
Jurre Houtkamp@jurrehoutkamp
Typefully is fantastic and way too cheap for what you get.
We’ve tried many alternatives at @framer but nothing beats it. If you’re still tweeting from Twitter you’re wasting time.
DHH@dhh
This is my new go-to writing environment for Twitter threads.
They've built something wonderfully simple and distraction free with Typefully 😍
Santiago@svpino
For 24 months, I tried almost a dozen Twitter scheduling tools.
Then I found @typefully, and I've been using it for seven months straight.
When it comes down to the experience of scheduling and long-form content writing, Typefully is in a league of its own.
Luca Rossi ꩜@lucaronin
After trying literally all the major Twitter scheduling tools, I settled with @typefully.
Killer feature to me is the native image editor — unique and super useful 🙏
Visual Theory@visualtheory_
Really impressed by the way @typefully has simplified my Twitter writing + scheduling/publishing experience.
Beautiful user experience.
0 friction.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Queue your content in seconds
Write, schedule and boost your tweets - with no need for extra apps.
Schedule with one click
Queue your post with a single click - or pick a time manually.
Pick the perfect time
Time each post to perfection with Typefully's performance analytics.
Boost your content
Retweet and plug your posts for automated engagement.
Start creating a content queue.
Write once, publish everywhere
We natively support multiple platforms, so that you can expand your reach easily.
Check the analytics that matter
Build your audience with insights that make sense.
Writing prompts & personalized post ideas
Break through writer's block with great ideas and suggestions.
Never run out of ideas
Enjoy daily prompts and ideas to inspire your writing.
Use AI for personalized suggestions
Get inspiration from ideas based on your own past tweets.
Flick through topics
Or skim through curated collections of trending tweets for each topic.
Write, edit, and track tweets together
Write and publish with your teammates and friends.
Share your drafts
Brainstorm and bounce ideas with your teammates.
NEW
@aaditsh
I think this thread hook could be improved.
@frankdilo
On it 🔥
Add comments
Get feedback from coworkers before you hit publish.
Read, Write, Publish
Read, WriteRead
Control user access
Decide who can view, edit, or publish your drafts.
Last week, with the decision by Washington and Berlin (to a certain degree forced on them) to supply MBTs (Main Battle Tanks) to Ukraine in 2023, we witnessed the dividends being paid by the growing assertiveness of Europe’s Northern and Central/Eastern nations.
This has been coming since the moments Russian forces launched their full scale invasion. Here back in early March has been one of the real powerful presences of this movement, Estonian PM Kaja Kallas, saying that its so important that Putin outright ‘lose’ this war.
twitter.com/janicedickson/status/1499327611188781061?s=61&t=cfwXxd2Wvz96x4HiJNdwJQ
Now at the time, these kinds of statements received little coverage.
Indeed, as per normal, much of the reporting came from the capitals of the larger western European capitals,
This is not surprising. Much of the media has been conditioned to look to the large countries for leadership in Europe, and individually they are the most powerful.
I do think the pressure that was applied by the Nordics, Baltics and Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, etc, really do matter, and going forward their outlooks will play an outsized role in the establishment of Europe’s security priorities.
This is because they have a common outlook that will hold them together, and secondly because they are together one of the richest groupings in Europe and they will grown relatively richer in the future.
This wealth has lead them to construct some of the most powerful military forces on the continent.
The outlook is clear—what Russia has done is not some misbegotten great power gambit, it is the greatest existential threat they have faced since 1989 and probably 1945.
Russia was always thought to be unpredictable and dangerous by these powers, but now it has been revealed as genocidal and expansionist.
The only way to hold such a Russia in check is not only to defeat outright the Russian forces now attacking Ukraine, its to guard against a Russian strategic rebirth in the future.
They don’t want to go back to the old (failed) ‘great’ powers way of doing business, where Berlin would call Moscow, and they would work out arrangements that the smaller countries would have to follow.
This outlook is combined with great and growing wealth, and significant military power. The wealth factor is sometimes overlooked, as individually these are considered ‘small’ powers—however collectively they are far, far, wealthier than Russia for instance.
twitter.com/phillipspobrien/status/1612723554767839232?s=61&t=3uyCofqtbSD_ZX4ImzAWWA
So these countries have a particular mindset, have wealth and technological expertise and possess some of the best equipped militaries in Europe.
From the Finnish and Polish Armies, to the Norwegian and Swedish Air Forces, etc, we see some of the most modernized and up to date military formations in Europe. One example, together Norway, Denmark, Finland and Poland have plans to purchase more than 150 F-35s.
Britain now is looking at an eventual force of between 60-80 F-35s.
Not only would the four Northern/Eastern countries significantly outnumber the British in this, they would frankly significantly outclass the Russians, whose ability to undertake complex air operations looks extremely limited.
So the new European strategic grouping is coming into its own, and it needs to be respected.
Tanks—Whats Really Important About Them
What this grouping did was help force Washington and Berlin to change policy and approve the transfer of NATO MBTs to Ukraine. This was the most important weapons transfer story of the week by far.
Now in some ways the most important part of the story is not the tanks themselves, which will take months to get deployed, kitted out, etc, but the fact that it was a sign that the US and Germany were now moving towards the Ukraine must win/Russia must lose camp.
I certainly don’t think they are entirely there yet, but the pressure they are feeling from other European states, the Ukrainian performance as a military force, and Russia’s increasingly barbaric behavior, are all pushing them that way.
As for tanks, my position on the more skeptical end is well known. I think the tank’s value before the invasion was overstated, and everything we’ve seen so far in the war confirms that.
Destroying tanks with cheaper more numerous systems is far too easy in relative terms, and this means that fielding tanks in the way expected before the war has not happened.
What the tank is not, is the weapon that most in the analytical community assumed it would be before February 24—the fast moving, breakthrough and exploitation weapons of popular imagination.
If you go back to the start of the war, you can find many frankly embarrassing maps put up by people, with large red, columns of fast moving advancing Russian formations across Ukraine.
That did not happen, and has not happened in this war. Indeed, the longer the war has gone on, the more the tank seems to be used as a support weapon.
It doesn’t actually make or exploit openings, but it operates as a form of mobile artillery more than anything else—supporting infantry or lighter, faster vehicles as they try to move forward. The tank is not obsolete, but it is not what people said it would be.
Btw, anyone trying to claim that they are fighting against those who say the tank is now obsolete, might be asked who has called the tank obsolete. They are just setting up straw men, generally to try and protect their failed vision of what the tank would in this war.
Personally, Im not sure 150 NATO MBTs will in and of themselves be that important. They will help give Ukraine a qualitative edge in this area, but in and of themselves, they will be unlikely to create Ukrainian breakthroughs and exploitations.
In other words, they will help, but remain support/secondary systems in this war.
What Ukraine really need to push the Russian back is more and better ranged weapons to do what has worked consistently in this war degrade Russian supply and logistics and reduce Russian mobility.
Those who, I would argue, understand modern warfare more completely, understand that these fights, for aircraft, better anti air systems, ATACMs, and other ranged systems, will play a more decisive role in the outcome of this war than MBTs.
twitter.com/stavridisj/status/1619458795880726530?s=61&t=5Pms45KhO_jTNpCHvnKJtw
It’s the difference between those who see war as a series of battles and those who see war as a continuous cycle of engagement and attrition. People focussing on the coming ‘offensives’, I would argue, have an episodic and only partial understanding of the process of war.
It’s the continuous struggle for force generation and deployment that will determine the course of the war. Tanks are used only in the battle stage, when the forces directly engage.
What matters far more is how those battles are shaped (actually determined) ahead of time. That is done through logistics control and attrition. So tanks will help—range weapons and air power will determine.